Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: The Illinois Election Board votes to keep Trump and Biden on the March Primary Ballot. WTTW

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Here’s the rest of your morning roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 7:45 am

Comments

  1. How does the board make any decisions about federal office holders if they “lack jurisdiction on a constitutional question”. How can they ever enforce any eligibility requirements? If a 20 year old tries to run for the Presidency, does the Board have to allow it?

    Comment by Perrid Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 8:28 am

  2. Re: Fox2Now story

    I know we talked about this yesterday. I am not insensitive to racial inequities and inequalities, nor am I suggesting ignorance as a strategy. But this policy does.

    Operating an unregistered vehicle should not be ignored. Several of the other provisions are also misguided in my opinion. If we find that those jurisdictions where people of color live are the jurisdictions where these laws are enforced, then we have clear evidence of differential justice, and perhaps those jurisdictions should be addressed. But creating state law that says police cannot pull cars over that are unlicensed and unregistered is not a solution. If such people are not registering their cars, they are almost certainly not insuring their cars (which could easily be managed by insurance companies).

    A better solution would focus on communities rather than the state level, and address inequities and inequalities.

    Comment by H-W Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 8:54 am

  3. I’ve been informed that Rep. Slaughter is pulling HB4603

    Comment by Wyatt Earp Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 9:17 am

  4. @ Perrid

    In the scenario you mentioned, existing clear constitutional language prohibits a 20yr old from running for President and they would be summarily dismissed from the ballot were they to try, in a similar manner as would be the case with a non-citizen attempting to run for President. In such a situation, the board could ask the supposed 20yr old to submit a valid birth certificate indicating that he was actually 35+yrs old.

    In the case of Donald Trump, the constitutional issues of a 20yr old do not apply, nor do the issues of non-citizenship (or anything else under that particular section).

    Comment by Former ILSIP Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 9:23 am

  5. I grew up in the south suburbs… and this is not representative of the Dolton I remember. I can’t imagine Dolton has the money to fund the described extravagance.

    Comment by Lincoln Lad Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 9:27 am

  6. ===pulling HB4603===

    How would one do such a thing?

    Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 10:19 am

  7. =In the case of Donald Trump=

    While I have no issue with them leaving him on the ballot, the constitution and election law give states broad authority in determining who goes on the ballot. Deferring to the USSC is a bit of a copout. They could have said no.

    Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 10:45 am

  8. == pulling HB4603 ==

    Don’t believe there’s any provision for that in House rules. But he could file a motion to “table” the bill, which would have a similar effect. Though, I’m not sure parliamentary maneuvers will satisfy the social media outrage machine.

    Comment by Rules check Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 10:49 am

  9. It seems to me disappearing messages are better than the internet always remembers messages. At least young people can be stupid and young without leaving a trace (assuming they survive.)

    I think social media and its hidden algorithms is a bigger issue. IMO I think they should be required to publish their algorithm (in pseudocode or simplified language), get the algorithm approved by a board, and when they change the algorithm in production, get those changes approved. At least then there would be transparency.

    Right now I’ve stopped all social media except reddit & mastodon which can both be configured for latest posts only, so I don’t have anger triggers being used on me.

    Comment by cermak_rd Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 10:58 am

  10. Wow, that Yorkville closed session is a mess that reflects badly on the entire community. Multiple members of the school board not even trying to hide that their goal is to pretend racism doesn’t exist. The district’s response to the FOIA attempts shows that they absolutely 100% knew that the discussion was both illegal AND was going to reflect extremely poorly on the board and administration, and wanted to hide this incredibly gross discourse from the community.

    Comment by Suburban Mom Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 10:59 am

  11. @ JS Mill

    With respect, that is a very risky path to take, as the question becomes “What do you do if he wins?” If a state arbitrarily says that someone is not qualified to be president (and they have not already been convicted in the Senate under an impeachment trial - and further adjudicated to be not allowed to hold public office again), and removes them from the ballot, how can they legally justify accepting him as president if he wins? It’s a lot easier and much more defensibly legal to defer to the SC.

    Comment by Former ILSIP Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 11:05 am

  12. ===I think social media and its hidden algorithms is a bigger issue. IMO I think they should be required to publish their algorithm (in pseudocode or simplified language), get the algorithm approved by a board, and when they change the algorithm in production, get those changes approved. At least then there would be transparency. ===

    I work in this space and the digital services act in the EU, which is just entering enforcement now, is going to provide at least some of this. There’s also been considerable court scrutiny of algorithmic bias in the United States, although mostly in sectors like insurance.

    Algorithm inspections are coming, and they won’t be in simplified language; they’ll be done by specialists who can read the code. Watch the EU’s rollout of DSA/DMA enforcement closely; that’s going to provide a template for California (who will almost certainly be the first mover in the US). We’ve also seen federal agencies significantly upskilling on algorithms and AI in their hiring decisions, so it’s possible there may actually be federal regulatory movement (or even Congressional movement) after the election this year.

    Comment by Suburban Mom Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 11:30 am

  13. Saint Anne is unlike the land around it. Sandy, silty soil there feels like a piece of the Mississippi Delta was dropped there; it’s better for growing melons than corn and beans. It’s also kind of out of the way yet close to Kankakee and Chicago. Back in Capone’s day it would have been a good place to hide a body. Today enjoy it for the unique biome.

    Just don’t go digging anywhere.

    Comment by Give Us Barabbas Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 11:31 am

  14. Suburban Mom, I agree. Plus it sounds like Just Mercy is a pretty good book.
    And since when is overturning convictions of people who didn’t commit the crime for which they were condemned to die a controversial topic? Nevertheless if they wanted to discuss it, they should have had the ability to discuss it in public.

    Comment by cermak_rd Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 11:33 am

  15. Give the IDOT workers their contract. Their work is dangerous, they get maimed, crippled, sometimes killed on the job by being hit or crushed by cars.
    The state came up with hundreds of millions of dollars to help out Chicago, they can afford to give the IDOT workers their contract.

    Comment by DuPage Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 12:31 pm

  16. =With respect, that is a very risky path to take, as the question becomes “What do you do if he wins?”=

    Purely tongue in cheek here but my response would be to do what trump did and declare it rigged and fake.

    Good discussion though and I don’t disagree with the pragmatic aspects of your point. From a purely constitutional perspective this issue was, in large part, left to the states to determine for themselves. Maybe that was a mistake.

    But your point is definitely not wrong.

    Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 12:34 pm

  17. Two things I don’t understand:
    1. How is the 14th amendment issue addressable anywhere other than in Federal Court? It is an issue established by US Constitutional Amendment regarding the holding of Federal office.
    2. Why hasn’t someone filed a 14th Amendment case in Federal Court before now (assuming that’s the case). It’s been three years.

    Comment by 37B Wednesday, Jan 31, 24 @ 1:11 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.