Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Griffin spokesperson confirms his boss won’t back Bailey
Next Post: General election season is almost upon us
Posted in:
* This news release was sent out during the break…
The Illinois State Police (ISP), under the direction of Governor Pritzker, submitted an emergency rule change to the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office implementing broader use of clear and present danger reports that can bar applicants from receiving a Firearm Owners Identification (FOID) card or revoke a current FOID card. The rule change allows for the use and maintenance of historic clear and present danger information even if the subject was not actively seeking or holding a FOID card at the time a Clear and Present Danger report was made and allows for use of these reports in possible future evaluations.
Since 2013, administrative rules have unnecessarily limited and complicated the ability of the Illinois State Police to consider Clear and Present Danger information over time. For example, the former administrative rule required a Clear and Present Danger to be “impending”, “imminent”, “substantial” or “significant.” Clear and Present Danger under state law however is more broadly defined requiring “physical or verbal behavior, such as violent, suicidal, or assaultive threats, actions, or other behavior…” This emergency rule will now allow the Illinois State Police to consider a broader range of information by simply applying the statutory definition of Clear and Present Danger. These emergency rules also will clarify ISP’s authority to use and retain Clear and Present Danger reports to the fullest extent allowed by state and federal law.
“For the sake of public safety, any FOID applicant with prior clear and present danger information needs to have that considered when having their application processed,” said Governor JB Pritzker. “These changes will immediately allow ISP to see a fuller picture of an applicant’s history and keep the people of Illinois safe from those who should not be in possession of firearms. I want to thank the members of the Joint Committee and Director Kelly for taking up this important issue and protecting Illinoisans.”
“These modifications to administrative law will immediately give the ISP the legal authority to consider more evidence when determining whether to issue or revoke a FOID card and will strengthen the ISP’s ability to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals,” said Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly.
Emergency rules may be submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) when an agency determines a threat to public interest, safety, or welfare requires rules to be adopted in less time than would be needed to complete the full proposed rule process. Emergency rules go into effect within ten days of filing but remain in effect for no more than 150 days. The Illinois State Police plans to submit these changes under the JCAR proposed rule process as well, with the intention of making these amendments permanent.
Clear and present danger reports are made by physicians, clinical psychologists, qualified examiners, school administrators, and law enforcement. This law is distinct from the Firearms Restraining Order. The Firearms Restraining Order is a court ordered restriction on firearms possession. Clear and Present Danger status is only one of many factors that can result in the revocation and denial of a FOID card. Other factors can include criminal records, mental health prohibitors, and other orders of protection.
* Context from Capitol News Illinois…
The change is meant to address gaps in the process that were identified in the wake of the July 4 mass shooting in Highland Park. The alleged shooter in that case had been the subject of a clear and present danger investigation, but under standards used at that time, ISP determined there was insufficient evidence to support such a determination. […]
ISP took the rulemaking action in response to the July 4 shooting in Highland Park after authorities announced the local police department had several interactions with the alleged Highland Park gunman that predated his application for a FOID card. ISP did not judge any of those interactions as disqualifying for firearm ownership under the previous administrative rules.
In September 2019, according to ISP, the Highland Park Police Department filed a clear and present danger report regarding the man who is now the suspect in the July 4 mass shooting, Robert Crimo III. The report indicated Crimo had made threats to his family.
When police went to Crimo’s house, both he and his mother denied there had been any threat of violence and Crimo told police he did not feel like hurting himself or others. The reviewing officer concluded there was insufficient evidence, under the standards in place, to support a clear and present danger determination.
* Sun-Times…
Nearly 20,000 Cook County residents are walking around with revoked firearm owner’s identification cards, with illegal guns presumably in their homes. […]
Since 2013, a team of six officers and one sergeant have gone to the homes of those whose FOID cards have been revoked, recovering 881 guns in those efforts. […]
The Cook County Sheriff’s office said of the nearly 20,000 with revoked cards, a little over 1,800 are subjects of “clear and present danger” reports compiled by the Illinois State Police. Those reports can bar applicants from receiving a FOID card or be used to revoke a current one.
And of the 30,000, nearly 25,000 have not accounted for their weapons, neglecting to file a disposition record that asserts they no longer possess weapons.
And now with the new rules on “clear and present danger” reports, there’s gonna be even more enforcement needed.
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 11:11 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Griffin spokesperson confirms his boss won’t back Bailey
Next Post: General election season is almost upon us
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
The parent should not be able to purchase a gun for their child who is suicidal, or has threatened to harm a person(s) in the past.
Comment by Mama Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 12:06 pm
Clear and Present Danger under state law however is more broadly defined requiring “physical or verbal behavior, such as violent, suicidal, or assaultive threats, actions, or other behavior…” This emergency rule will now allow the Illinois State Police to consider a broader range of information by simply applying the statutory definition of Clear and Present Dange
In September 2019, according to ISP, the Highland Park Police Department filed a clear and present danger report regarding the man who is now the suspect in the July 4 mass shooting, Robert Crimo III. The report indicated Crimo had made threats to his family.
When police went to Crimo’s house, both he and his mother denied there had been any threat of violence and Crimo told police he did not feel like hurting himself or others. The reviewing officer concluded there was insufficient evidence, under the standards in place, to support a clear and present danger determination
Im not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV but based on the limited facts released from HP is don’t see how they same situation would know disqualify someone. I assume there’s still need tow be evidence of some kind to make a determination on and ink this case,including the police report, none was documented. I hope a simple 911 call doesnt disqualify some these days otherwise your enemies could easily make a bogus call..hey, so and do said was was going to do….
I think there’s will be a bunch of litigation coming.
Comment by Rent free Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 12:30 pm
Why can’t we contract with private detectives to recover these weapons?
Comment by Thomas Paine Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 12:36 pm
According to https://isp.illinois.gov/Foid/Statistics, between June 2021 and June 2022 there were a total of 16,169 revocations. 6,755 disposition reports were filed in the same timeframe. Remember, FOIDs are also revoked for non-criminal reasons, including no longer being an Illinois resident.(https://isp.illinois.gov/Foid/FoidRevoked). So “presuming” every person with a revoked FOID is now own illegally is rather a stretch, given the statistically-proven law-abiding behavior of the mass of firearm owners and permit/license holders. FOID renewels vs. denied renewals from June 2021-2022 were 255,688 vs. 1,044 (denials were 0.004278%). But the Chicago gun-hating media loves a ‘bad gun/bad owner’ story.
Comment by thisjustinagain Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 12:46 pm
This needs a couple dozen well trained senior officers on a special task force. Departments all over the state buy into task forces for far less important things than this.
Comment by High Socks Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 1:59 pm
Maybe this is something another more competent agency can do.
Comment by The Dude Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 3:36 pm
@ The Dude -
Contract with local law enforcement to collect guns, instead of the Sheriff.
We have told LEO’s who is in the list, right?
This seems better than paying cities to enforce seatbelt laws.
Comment by Thomas Paine Monday, Aug 1, 22 @ 3:49 pm