Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: Bears would put $2B in private money in publicly owned lakefront stadium under new push. Sun-Times

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Here’s the rest…

posted by Isabel Miller
Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 6:44 am

Comments

  1. == Ex-Ald. Ed Burke keeps his law license … ==

    Court took the easy way out and ducked.

    While not an everyday occurrence, the IL SC does have cases cone before it where there is a conflict of interest for all the judges. The State Pension and State Health Insurance cases come to mind. In those instances the judges simply noted there was a conflict / self interest but that they had no alternative and had to issue a ruling in spite of said self interest.

    In Burke’s case here,if the court has ruled 4-3 that he could retain his law license, there would have been accusations of politics. Ducking the question completely avoids that.

    Comment by RNUG Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 7:08 am

  2. A state-of-the-art dome on the lakefront… the colonnades as part of a new green space and a legitimate war memorial… Super Bowls, Final Fours… I like it. A better solution, lease that Arlington Heights land to a farmer and sit on it until the right developer comes along.

    Comment by Lincoln Lad Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 7:21 am

  3. Explain something..george lucas,was,spent packing because law says no building on lakefront. How do the bears suggest they get around same hurdle. I would gather the same challenges will be filed against the bears.

    Comment by Red headed step child Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 8:38 am

  4. If they had respectfully moved the colonnades and memorial 20 years ago, they wouldn’t be stuck with the abomination of a stadium they have now. They could even have added a roof.

    Comment by Friendly Bob Adams Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 10:03 am

  5. == How do the bears suggest they get around same hurdle … ==

    Read the fine print. It’s going to be publicly owned with the sports teams just kicking in some money.

    Smart move … potentially dumps the maintenance on the public.

    Comment by RNUG Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 10:24 am

  6. ==How do the bears suggest they get around same hurdle. ==

    Because this stadium would be owned by the city and have a clear “public benefit.” The Obama Library created some precedent after the Lucas Museum fiasco.

    Also, there was never an actual ruling on the Lucas Museum, they gave up and left after the court refused to dismiss the case.

    Comment by supplied_demand Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 10:34 am

  7. Re Burke, maybe they need a mechanism where they could refer a disciplinary matter to the Supreme Court of a sister state. If not, let the ARDC Administrator have the final say. It’s ridiculous that a convicted felon can keep his law license.

    Comment by Big Dipper Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 10:40 am

  8. ===“With this grant we were able to do the construction with no additional impact to taxpayers”=== said a local park district administrator about a state grant.

    Local officials often say “it won’t cost anybody anything” when it actually does cost the state money. State money mostly is from state taxes and fees.

    Comment by DuPage Monday, Mar 11, 24 @ 11:13 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.