Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: Chicago migrants’ grievances focus mostly on treatment by shelter staff. Sun-Times

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Politico

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has piled up a stunning $15.3 million in campaign cash, according to the fundraising report for the last quarter of 2023.

The IL-08 Democrat has (again) surpassed his Democratic colleagues in Illinois, and he’s in an elite group of top fundraisers for House Democrats in Congress, having contributed more than $5.4 million this cycle to House Democrats.

Only Congressman Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, with $17 million cash on hand, has outraised Krishnamoorthi. It’s the kind of fundraising that fuels talk that Krishnamoorthi will one day run for U.S. Senate.

The rest of Illinois Dems: Jonathan Jackson (IL-01): $20,761, Robin Kelly (IL-02): $1.6 million, Delia Ramirez (IL-03): $363,708, Jesus “Chuy” Garcia (IL-04): $202,798, Mike Quigley (IL-05): $1.1 million, Sean Casten (IL-06): $1.1 million, Danny Davis (IL-07): $819,978, Jan Schakowsky (IL-09): $826,686, Brad Schneider (IL-10): $1.1 million, Bill Foster (IL-11): 1.7 million, Nikki Budzinski (IL-13): $1.4 million, Lauren Underwood (IL-14): $1.6 million and Eric Sorensen (IL-17): $1.6 million.

* Here’s the rest of your briefing…

posted by Isabel Miller
Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 7:44 am

Comments

  1. $15M? So is Raja running for governor or senator next?

    Comment by hisgirlfriday Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 8:27 am

  2. I cannot read the article Isabel highlighted from Crains. But I can say this. The anti-diversity and anti-equity and anti-inclusion organizations are very active not just in the business sector, but throughout government. They are very actively seeking to eliminate diversity initiatives and equity initiatives in higher ed as well as business.

    This effort is in my mind, unAmerican and evil. It represents efforts to use institutional means to marginalize the poor, ethnic minorities, immigrants, women, LGBTQ people.

    In that context alone, these efforts are white nationalist in their intent. They represent, in my mind, the epitome of white privilege such that white people are using political power to prevent the less privileged and the unprivileged from achieving success. While we do not like to use words such as white nationalism, misogyny, racism, etc., one only need to read the public writings of these organizations to see that ideologies made explicit.

    If we are to achieve our greatest potential as a state and as a nation, we the people need to stand up against these manifestations of exclusionary practices. We must elect leaders who are willing to create new legislation that empowers the powerless.

    I

    Comment by H-W Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 8:36 am

  3. “While we do not like to use words such as white nationalism, misogyny, racism”

    I’m fine using those words. I think most people are. Journalists are another story though. Mass media is fully invested in both-sidesing our politics no matter how absurd that becomes. It’s already been absurd for years.

    Comment by Larry Bowa Jr. Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 8:45 am

  4. ==exclusionary practices.==

    It’s by definition exclusionary to only allow certain groups of individuals to apply.

    I dislike America First Legal about as much as you can dislike something. I think they have sinister motives to all of the actions they take. But I also dislike targeted programs as well. I think they are inherently wrong.

    And I also hate this term and it’s actually offensive to me because I’m sick to death of all of the DEI training I have taken that tries to tell me that somehow I’ve had it better in life because I’m white. I’ve worked hard and to suggest that hard work was aided by my whiteness is asinine. I didn’t have a problem with DEI when it first started to gain steam but I can tell you that I’ve grown tired of it. The more it’s shoved down my throat the more I hate it. And I’m not alone, at least where I work. DEI programs don’t do what they are designed to do when the programs themselves are turning people anti-DEI. They need to find a different way of approaching the subject than they are now because it isn’t working.

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:07 am

  5. And I also hate the term white privilege is what I meant to say . . .

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:09 am

  6. ==Complaints ranged from racist remarks==

    If you dislike the migrants why would you work with them? Are you only working in the shelters so you make sure they are treated poorly? I can see that being true in some cases.

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:12 am

  7. It’s more than just attacking DEI initiatives and saying the quiet part out loud, Heritage Foundation has published their manifesto for purging “The Deep State”, which isn’t a dismantlement as much as repopulating the deep state with an “Army of conservative activists” whose only qualifications are fealty to the Kraken.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/opinion/project-2025-trump-administration.html

    Comment by PublicServant Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:13 am

  8. hisgirlfriday: you might as well start calling him Senator Raja

    Comment by The Truth Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:43 am

  9. === that somehow I’ve had it better in life because I’m white. ===

    So you think racism is bad, but you don’t think your life has been in any way better or more pleasant because you haven’t had to face racism? That doesn’t make any sense.

    Comment by Suburban Mom Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 9:52 am

  10. == that somehow I’ve had it better in life because I’m white. ==

    This makes no sense. Just because you had struggles doesn’t mean there weren’t institutional/systemic/cultural barriers you didn’t have to face on top of those struggles.

    Being white doesn’t inherently mean you are playing “The Game of Life” on easy mode, but whiteness does impart certain codes in that game which clear a good number of obstacles off the board.

    Comment by Leap Day William Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 10:05 am

  11. =So you think racism is bad, but you don’t think your life has been in any way better or more pleasant because you haven’t had to face racism?=

    Perhaps the distinction is that racism is a behavior, not a trait. DEI doesn’t necessarily make that distinction. Maybe it should.

    Comment by Pundent Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 10:14 am

  12. ==but you don’t think your life has been in any way better or more pleasant==

    I don’t subscribe to the belief that I have not had to work as hard to achieve what I have achieved simply because I’m white. But I respect other people’s opinions even though I may disagree with them.

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 10:15 am

  13. It’s so Chicago that someone who is part of the ARDC is being investigated by the ARDC.

    Comment by Big Dipper Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 10:57 am

  14. Dear Demoralized

    No need to be demoralized. I never said or suggested anything about you. I do not know you. You can work as hard as you like or not. I cannot and will not judge you as better or worse or equal to entire categories of others. You are you. You are free to be you.

    Indeed, this is not about you at all, so please do not take it personal whenever you hear that relative deprivation exists and is socially created. It actually does exist at the aggregate level. The ideas of white privilege and white advantage are not measures for judging the content of the character of individuals. To suggest that would be a false, since they involve a different level of analysis (e.g., group v. individual).

    That said, aggregate differences in access to socially important resources do exist in Illinois and elsewhere in the U.S. and the world. Words like privilege and disadvantage are used in the context of groups, and differential rates of group access to socially valuable resources, like quality education, housing stock, health care, good jobs, higher education, etc. And in Illinois, there really are relative advantages and disadvantages at the aggregate level, depending on where you are born, where you live, and which social categories to which people belong. To suggest otherwise is just not true.

    People of color, women, and LGBTQ people receive differential treatment in our Illinois communities and at the societal level. Just because some choose not to see that, does not mean that race does not overlap with opportunity structures in our communities and society. Claiming colorblindness or suggesting we become blind to color does not erase social categories and their histories of differntial access, nor the long term effects of that differential access.

    Social minorities by definition are excluded by exclusionary processes and practices from opportunities are a rate greater than are people who do not belong to these categories. As others have noted, there are privileges associated with belonging to the category labeled “white.” These privileges are not about gifts and they are not measured or defined at the individual level. Lots of white people struggle. But more people of color struggle. More women relative to men also struggle due to exclusionary practices and processes. And LGBTQ people? It is still perfectly legal to exclude these folks intentionally. Relative absences of disadvantages and negative experiences across groups are real, and measurable.

    Comment by H-W Friday, Mar 1, 24 @ 1:38 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.