Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
Next Post: Reinsdorf says ‘I don’t want to talk about that’ when asked why his ballclub needs another state subsidy

Isabel’s afternoon roundup

Posted in:

* Rich told subscribers about Rep. Cyril Nichols’ withdrawal Friday evening. From the Illinois State Board of Elections’ website

As Rich explained in one of his recent newspaper columns, House Speaker Chris Welch was opposing Rep. Nichols’ reelection and several unions were providing big dollars to his Democratic primary opponent Lisa Davis.

* Sun-Times

White Sox chairman Jerry Reinsdorf is heating up his pitch for a new South Loop baseball stadium.

Reinsdorf had a meeting scheduled Tuesday afternoon with Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, D-Hillside, to discuss his ambitious proposal for a ball park-anchored megadevelopment at the undeveloped plot known as “The 78” near Roosevelt Road and Clark Street, according to a spokesperson for the speaker.

The billionaire owner was expected to hold court with other officials on the glitzy plan as lawmakers gather in Springfield ahead of Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s annual budget address on Wednesday.

A spokesman for Illinois Senate President Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, didn’t have any details on a potential meeting with Reinsdorf. […]

A spokeswoman for Pritzker said no meeting with Reinsdorf was on the agenda, and he still hasn’t been briefed by the developer. The second-term Democratic governor has been lukewarm on the prospect of putting taxpayer dollars into a stadium.

He’ll be meeting with each of the four legislative leaders this afternoon.

* US Senator Tammy Duckworth…

U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—lead sponsor of the Access to Family Building Act, which would protect every American’s right to access in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and other assisted reproductive technology (ART) services—issued the following statement after Alabama’s State Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos created during the IVF process are “children” under state law, threatening access to IVF for those who need it to start or grow their family:

“Since the Supreme Court threw out Roe v. Wade, our nation has seen a wave of Republican-led states enacting strict abortion bans to severely limit their residents’ right to access basic reproductive care, leaving many hopeful parents—and those of us who relied on IVF to start and grow our own families—worried about whether access to these important technologies could be next. The ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court—effectively labeling women who undergo IVF as criminals and our doctors as killers—proves that we were right to be worried. No one looking to start or grow their family, in any state, deserves to be criminalized. Now is the time for Congress to pass my Access to Family Building Act and establish a statutory right to access IVF and other ART services for all Americans nationwide.”

* Here’s the rest…

posted by Isabel Miller
Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 2:35 pm

Comments

  1. –Allen Skillicorn is the subject of six ethics complaints–

    Sounds like it’s about time for Allen to move to another state again.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 2:41 pm

  2. what did nichols do to make Welch angry again?

    Comment by wowie Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 2:50 pm

  3. I have a feeling Rep. Nichols will land on his feet somehow.

    Comment by 47th Ward Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 2:57 pm

  4. –Allen Skillicorn is the subject of six ethics complaints– “If you don’t think your family has a black sheep, it’s you.”

    Comment by Anon 3:01 Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:01 pm

  5. ===will land on his feet somehow. ===

    I mean, he has a job at City Colleges.

    Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:06 pm

  6. Wondering if the Senate GOPie Big Guy(always forget the name) will feel better about funding the new SOX giveaway than he did about “non-citizen welfare state”? How many giveaways does the Rezko land need before something happens? Does this mean the U of I expansion can happen at the existing U of I campus.

    Comment by Annon'in Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:26 pm

  7. If I move to Alabama does that mean I can claim the 8 frozen embryos I have as dependents for taxes and to collect public benefits (larger family means closer to poverty line even if I am making a Union salary)? More than worth the continued storage costs against my taxes.

    Comment by Unionman Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:27 pm

  8. Welp, way to disenfranchise all those voters.

    Comment by ;) Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:37 pm

  9. As for Skillicorn - woof, what a childish man. He is correct that his speech is protected by the First Amendment…and Allen, no one’s trying to arrest you for it. But if you wanna be on the city council, there’s a code of conduct there to follow.

    Comment by The Truth Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:41 pm

  10. decriminalizing magic mushrooms? let’s get more basic. who will write a bill to make growing pot at home legal? isn’t this what the NYGov just announced? make homegrown legal.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 3:50 pm

  11. - who will write a bill to make growing pot at home legal? -

    Anybody listening?…Kelly Cassidy?

    Comment by Dotnonymous x Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 4:12 pm

  12. re: the Alabama embryo case -

    When one of the concurring Justices invokes God multiple times in his concurrence you know the level of jurisprudence you are dealing with so it should be no surprise that a decision as ridiculous as this has come to be.

    Comment by Demoralized Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 4:37 pm

  13. Re: Alabama
    So this decision does not in any way prevent or outlaw IVF. It simply means that embryos, once created, cannot be destroyed without legal consequence. The unborn are being rightfully recognized as persons with rights. It’s about time. I can only hope this legal doctrine can one day be expanded to include every state and every unborn person and the abhorrent practice of abortion on demand for personal convenience can be ended once and for all.

    Comment by Captain Obvious Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 7:32 pm

  14. @ Captain Oblivious

    Why are someone’s embryos any of your business? Once again you and your ilk want to get involved in someone’s personal medical business. Keep your nose out of other people’s business.

    Comment by Demoralized Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 8:05 pm

  15. Re: CaptainObvious … without making this like Twitter, I do wonder. How do you rectify what you’re saying — which is a legitimate point of view that one can hold — with a belief that embryos are not persons. What legal standard can you bring forward that is not based on a religious belief, but simply on a “can’t be argued with” approach. The problem with using religion or faith as the basis of a legal argument is that not everyone even shares the basic definition. So … if you can, what the is the non-religious argument for this point of view?

    Comment by IllinoisCitizen Tuesday, Feb 20, 24 @ 10:01 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
Next Post: Reinsdorf says ‘I don’t want to talk about that’ when asked why his ballclub needs another state subsidy


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.