Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: The Chicago Tribune’s unionized newsroom staff are on strike. Sun-Times

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Good news



Governor Pritzker will be at the South Shore Cultural Center in Chicago at 11 am to unveil an anti-violence initiative. Click here to watch.

* Here’s the rest of your morning roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 7:44 am

Comments

  1. Davis-Gates should be immediately dismissed. If an administrator made the same statement, figuratively or not, they would be terminated and for good reason. She is an embarrassment to public educators.

    Comment by JS Mill Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 8:17 am

  2. Wouldn’t it make more sense to build a new White Sox stadium in a disadvantaged part of the city to stimulate economic development?

    Comment by low level Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 9:28 am

  3. I’m still not convinced that the estate tax issue for farmers is quite what’s being claimed, but this attempt ($6m cap instead of $12m) seems much more reasonable, and the rhetoric has certainly improved from last year’s absurd claims

    Comment by Stephanie Kollmann Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 9:45 am

  4. No, the White Sox are a private company that is going to make decisions that are in its bests interests. Its purpose is to make money, not stimulate the economy. If it is presented with a development proposal from a disadvantaged part of the city, I’m sure it will consider it, but what makes sense for the White Sox is not necessarily aligned with the interests of the city. If the city or state tries to force a location on the White Sox, they can just move to a different city.

    Comment by White Sox Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 9:46 am

  5. I still don’t see how a new Sox stadium would work with essentially zero parking on site. Metra schedules after night games are not optimal. Most lines have once an hour, all-stop trains. Takes forever to get home.

    Comment by Friendly Bob Adams Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 9:50 am

  6. ==I still don’t see how a new Sox stadium would work with essentially zero parking on site.==

    You can stop worrying because the plan has 4,000 parking spots on-site for the stadium. They could also build parking garage off-site.

    Comment by supplied_demand Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 10:01 am

  7. The Sox already got a free stadium. No more government handouts. They are a private, for-profit business and can pay for their own facility without mooching off of taxpayers.

    Not. One. Cent.

    Comment by Jerry Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 10:10 am

  8. == I’m still not convinced that the estate tax issue for farmers is quite what’s being claimed … ==

    While saving family farms is almost always a good thing, the fact is most medium sized and larger family farms have likely done a bunch of estate planning, including setting up multiple corporate structures, trusts, and even insurance to pay any inheritance tax bills. I see this as more likely fo help the land rich but cash poor smaller farmers.

    Comment by RNUG Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 10:15 am

  9. I am not sure what re-arrange existing bonds means, and I do not have a Crains subscription so I can’t read the article. Still have not seen anything about who is going to pay the bill. Not one cent. We already did this once.

    Comment by James the Intolerant Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 10:34 am

  10. The farmland tax limits I don’t see why they just don’t index them to the average yearly increase of farmland so they don’t have to argue about this every few years.

    Comment by cermak_rd Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 10:39 am

  11. God Bless Allen Lynch. We need more heroes like him.

    Comment by Paddyrollingstone Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 11:00 am

  12. Oops, Sox article is in the Times. Not sure what working “creatively” in the current Finance Authority system means, I guess more will be revealed at some point.

    Comment by James the Intolerant Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 11:21 am

  13. ==. If the city or state tries to force a location on the White Sox, they can just move to a different city.==

    The White Sox are indeed a private company & are free to do as they please to maximize profits and increase the value of the team. The city and state are also free to end the sweetheart deals.

    Comment by low level Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 11:25 am

  14. “I don’t see why they just don’t index them”

    If you read the accompanying article from Farm Week Now - the new bill would …

    “In addition, the measures tie the new $6 million exemption level to inflation and will be adjusted each year according to the increase in the Consumer Price Index”

    Comment by Donnie Elgin Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 11:25 am

  15. = Wouldn’t it make more sense to build a new White Sox stadium in a disadvantaged part of the city to stimulate economic development? =

    It could. Where are you proposing, and what do you plan to tell the neighbors who won’t be able to afford their higher property tax bill after the project is done?

    Comment by Dirty Red Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 11:58 am

  16. In 2010 College of Dupage ran a referendum based on the theory that instead of reducing the levy, due to the bond expiration from a previous referendum some 20 years prior, to continue at the same levy as if the bonds were still there and make capital improvements within the college.
    So they were not asking for any new property tax money they just asked for the current tax money to stay with the college instead of reverting. It was pretty slick and won almost 55-45.

    My guess is the Sox are looking for a rework of current fund resources not to go away but rather shift them to a new location, thereby not officially increasing anything but still having the ability to carry that line of “capital”.

    Or I may not know how any of this is working at all. lol

    Comment by Frida's boss Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 1:56 pm

  17. CTU President statements were brushed off by CTU last night on their Twitter account as no big deal.
    If a CPS Principal had said the same thing CTU would have been all over the internet losing their mind.
    This came out the same day the University of Chicago teacher and aide story came out of them laughing and threatening a special needs student. No word from CTU on one of their members doing that?

    Also any chance those audits for the last 3 years are coming out?

    Comment by Frida's boss Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 2:32 pm

  18. To Frida,

    Yes SDG comments are shameful and deserve at least a public apology even if they were clearly not meant to be taken literally .

    The charter school incident though is not a reflection on CTU. In fact, CTU is pushing hard to hold these schools accountable in large part due to their dismal treatment of diverse learners.

    Comment by Common Sense Thursday, Feb 1, 24 @ 5:58 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.