Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: C’mon, people
Next Post: Concerns growing over O’Hare expansion costs

Ed Burke trial coverage roundup

Posted in:

* Crain’s

Whether [former Chicago Ald. Danny Solis] takes the witness stand himself still remains up in the air. The prosecution has said they will not call him as a witness, but Burke’s defense team says they could.

Instead, the prosecution relied on the testimony of FBI agent Ryan McDonald to walk the jury through how Solis became a government witness and provide context for the series of recordings they watched.

Solis’ path from chair of the Zoning Committee to government informant began at 7:55 a.m. on June 1, 2016, when McDonald and another agent knocked on the door of his Southwest Side home and told him the feds had been listening to his phone for years, provided evidence of his crimes and let him know he “was in trouble,” according to testimony on Tuesday.

The next day, Solis decided to cooperate, including wearing the wiretaps against his colleagues, and set in motion the sprawling government corruption investigations that have thus far snared Burke and former House Speaker Michael Madigan, whom Solis also secretly recorded.

* Tribune

Prosecutors on Tuesday displayed some of the centerpiece evidence against Burke: wiretapped conversations and secretly recorded video from ex-Ald. Daniel Solis, who cooperated extensively with the government against Burke and others after authorities presented him with evidence of his own misdeeds.

In a shaky video apparently captured from somewhere on Solis’s chest, Burke and Solis talked about the Post Office’s New York-based developers — then Burke made an unsolicited comment that surely perked up the ears of the FBI agents listening in the wire room.

“Well, while you’re at it, recommend the good firm of Klafter & Burke to do the tax work,” Burke told Solis said on the Aug. 26, 2016, recording.

Solis laughed on the recording and agreed to mention Burke’s law firm, which did property tax appeals for a roster of wealthy clients, to the Old Post Office developers at their next meeting.

“And then we can certainly talk about a marketing arrangement for you,” Burke said, which prosecutors allege was an illegal offer by Burke to pay Solis an under-the-table referral fee for any law business he brought in.

Click here to listen to the recorded conversation between Ed Burke and Daniel Solis.

From Rich Miller: This looks like Burke was trying to put the chair of the city council’s Zoning Committee on the payroll, which would’ve been mighty sweet for a property tax appeals lawyer.

* WTTW

In one phone call, recorded on Aug. 26, 2016, Solis and Burke were discussing the redevelopment plans when Burke told his colleague: “While you’re at it, recommend the good firm of Klafter & Burke to do the tax work,” adding that “we can certainly talk about a marketing arraignment” for Solis as a part of that deal.

“Alright I certainly will,” Solis replied.

A month later, Solis made a video recording of a face-to-face meetup with Burke inside his office. In clips played in court Tuesday, Burke — who can be seen wearing glasses, a pinstripe suit and an American flag pin — asked for Solis to set up a meeting between Burke and the developers.

Solis then brought up the marketing arrangement Burke previously mentioned.

Burke can be heard replying: “I’m of the belief that if you get help from somebody to get some work, that they’re entitled to share in it, and it’s just up to us to figure out a way that it can be done so that there’s no pitfalls, legally.

“Listen,” he added, “it wouldn’t be the first time, won’t be the last time. I’m a believer in sharing the wealth.”

* WGN

Prosecutors alleged that was a promise for kickbacks to be made to Solis. But on tape, Burke said that agreement would have to be above board.

During cross-examination, defense attorney Joe Duffy hammered [F.B.I. special agent Ryan McDonald] on the FBI’s tactic of using ruses to try to determine Burke’s motivations, telling the jury that what Solis said on tape wasn’t true.

“Is it fair to describe that as an act of deception designed to mislead someone?” Duffy asked McDonald on the stand.

“It can be,” McDonald replied.

* More…

posted by Isabel Miller
Wednesday, Nov 29, 23 @ 11:54 am

Comments

  1. I’m not sure this evidence will be compelling for the prosecution.

    Comment by AlfondoGonz Wednesday, Nov 29, 23 @ 3:13 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: C’mon, people
Next Post: Concerns growing over O’Hare expansion costs


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.