Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: Johnson unveils 60-day shelter limit for asylum seekers ahead of big Pritzker aid infusion. Crain’s

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

Governor Pritzker is set to announce new state investments in services for asylum seekers at 10 am today. Click here to watch.

* Here’s the rest of your morning roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 7:46 am

Comments

  1. == 60 day shelter limit ==

    Uh, then what ? Put people on the streets ?

    Comment by sal-says Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 8:20 am

  2. Most of these people have to wait at least 6 months for work permits, right? And then they have to get through the backlog. So these people can’t legally support themselves, so what’s the thinking here? What’s supposed to happen to them after 60 days?

    Comment by Perrid Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 8:28 am

  3. ===Uh, then what ===

    ===What’s supposed to happen to them after 60 days? ===

    Click the links. C’mon. Don’t wait to be spoon fed. This ain’t Twitter.

    Comment by Rich Miller Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 8:39 am

  4. FYI– MLL Admin. had a 30 day limit that was enforced, which was repealed (or at least not enforced) by this Administration.

    Comment by LastModDemStanding Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 8:54 am

  5. ===had a 30 day limit that was enforced===

    It was phased in and I don’t think it was widely enforced because some people have been in shelters since well before MLL left office.

    Comment by Rich Miller Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 9:27 am

  6. re: lifetime restrictions on child sex offenders

    The headline greatly understates the crime he committed. This was a high school coach, who violently abused a child on the team he had a position of authority over.

    I’m sure he feels inconvenienced, but that is not the same as unconstitutional. He also didn’t say he hasn’t continued the behavior, he just says he hasn’t had a recorded offense for it. Something in the way he is describing himself is hiding something dark.

    As for the case before the Supreme Court, there are different levels of having to register as an offender in Illinois. Many offenses only require 10 years or less of mandatory registration. He has the sentence he does, a lifetime requirement, specifically because of the severity of his crime. It’s not arbitrary.

    Just because someone is not physically in prison, doesn’t mean they are finished serving their court issued sentence. The court sentence in this case includes lifetime registration. This is already the alternative to keeping him physically in prison for life for his crime.

    There is a rather organized outside effort to reverse many child abuse punishments in Illinois. I didn’t see the organization mentioned in the story, and maybe this case is too far for even them to support.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 9:44 am

  7. From the WBEZ story on the elected school board:

    “The Senate president dropped this on everyone’s head without the benefit of stakeholder input or even understanding,” Davis Gates said.

    Um, no. Your lobbyist testified in a committee hearing for all districts to be up at once and your union advocated for a fully elected board for years.

    Comment by Tony T. Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 10:00 am

  8. ==Just because someone is not physically in prison, doesn’t mean they are finished serving their court issued sentence. The court sentence in this case includes lifetime registration. This is already the alternative to keeping him physically in prison for life for his crime.==

    No, actually the U.S. Supreme Court has held that sex offender registration and related restrictions are civil measures and not punishment. Of course that’s an absurd legal fiction, but it’s the law. Your claim that lifetime registration is an alternative to lifetime imprisonment doesn’t appear to have any basis in the law. Maybe you believe that’s what the law should be, but it’s not an accurate statement.

    Comment by charles in charge Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 10:15 am

  9. “registration and related restrictions are civil measures and not punishment.”

    Yes. As applied by a court due to a conviction. If you fail to register, or are trying to hide your location, that’s a criminal offense not a civil one.

    That’s also why I very clearly stated ‘alternative to’ lifetime imprisonment. As in, a different legally applied sentence other than imprisonment.

    The offender registry is nothing more than a specifically named form of probation. That is in fact widely understood, even if you don’t like it.

    Illinois also has almost identical registration requirements for violent offenders outside of child offenders. That you are not focused on the same supposed rights of those violent offenders and only on child offenses lays out your position and motivation quite clearly.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 10:40 am

  10. ==That you are not focused on the same supposed rights of those violent offenders and only on child offenses lays out your position and motivation quite clearly.==

    What on earth are you talking about? How do you presume to know what I am “focused on”? The linked item and your comment are specifically about sex offender restrictions.

    Comment by charles in charge Thursday, Nov 16, 23 @ 2:18 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.