Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: Chicago signs land use contract to house migrants on vacant lot in Brighton Park. NBC Chicago broke the story

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Here’s the rest of your morning roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 7:45 am

Comments

  1. “Calumet City officials ticket Daily Southtown reporter for ‘hampering’ city employees with questions”

    Many local officials are just one opportunity away from duplicating the events which happened to that Kansas newspaper.

    These are the people who absolutely love that local news is dying. There are many people just like Gideon Cody - and now Thaddeus Jones.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 8:14 am

  2. Hat Tip to WBEZ on the story on six plays written by teens on gun violence at the Goodman Theatre.
    Been going to the Goodman since it was down by the Art Institute and just never picked up on this excellent program.
    Also Hat Tip to Isabel’s Morning Briefing for highlighting this story.

    Comment by Back to the Future Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 9:12 am

  3. Does Mayor Johnson have any intergovernmental affairs people? Yesterday should not have happened and would not have with a competent IGA team.

    Comment by low level Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 9:14 am

  4. In Alabama, they arrest journalists: https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/media/2023/11/01/atmore-alabama-journalists-arrested-grand-jury/

    Comment by JoanP Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 9:21 am

  5. No wonder the owner approached city hall about its vacant land. $91k a month with no improvements for a piece of unproductive real estate lease by a government who won’t miss a payment. A hero to all parasitic vacant land owners in Chicago.

    Comment by DS Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 9:55 am

  6. ===Does Mayor Johnson have any intergovernmental affairs people?===

    Yes, but no director.

    Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:04 am

  7. “who asked what the state intends to do with people who refuse to register their weapons”

    The more interesting question is since the ISP has no clue which FOID card holders may or may not possess the now-banned weapons or accessories - how would they ever identify them?

    Comment by Donnie Elgin Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:15 am

  8. ===how would they ever identify them?===

    Start with the plaintiffs in DeVore’s case.

    Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:17 am

  9. ===Start with the plaintiffs in DeVore’s case.===

    I actually laughed. That was chef kiss.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:18 am

  10. “Start with the plaintiffs in DeVore’s case.”

    This will never not be one of the funniest things to happen. Even as it was happening the obvious was being pointed out.

    A bunch of people who were opposed to giving their names to the government, willingly provided their names in a list to the government.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:25 am

  11. == - how would they ever identify them?
    ==

    That’s one of those it depends answers.

    If you are like me and don’t trust the government to follow their own rules, you might suspect ISP has maintained a database of all the background check approvals the past, say, 10 years instead of destroying them as required by law after processing. Or you might suspect the State may inspect the transfer records firearms ships are required to maintain for 10 years.

    Now that wouldn’t get private transfers or hand built from 80% parts firearms, but it would identify a significant number of currently banned firearms.

    I don’t think the State will actually do the above, given manpower shortages, but you did ask how the State would know … and those are two possible approaches.

    Comment by RNUG Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 10:52 am

  12. =and those are two possible approaches.=

    Yep, unlikely but yes.

    Comment by JS Mill Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 11:11 am

  13. With regard to gun registration, it really drives me nuts when people use the term “law abiding citizens.” They are by definition not law abiding if they are failing to follow the law.

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 11:12 am

  14. “how would they ever identify them?”

    Social media image searches.

    When owning a firearm is a large part of a personality, it becomes something to openly brag about to show status for fellow in-groupers.

    The search function on facebook is a source of endless entertainment when used correctly. I doubt it escapes the attention of law enforcement.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 11:44 am

  15. So what will become of those who possess weapons that were purchased prior to the new law, but who refuse to register them?

    Let’s see. Your right to own is not infringed. You are being allowed to possess weapons that are not longer legal. However, your right to own is being regulated such that you need to register the fact that you own a weapon that is now determined to be illegal going forward.

    If you fail to register your right to still possess a weapon, then you create the conditions by which the state will have no knowledge of when you purchased the weapon, and no evidence that the weapon was owned prior to becoming illegal.

    Hence, the ISP would “logically” conclude the weapon was not registered by the person who possesses it, and thus would be expected to confiscate the unregistered, illegal weapon.

    Upon confiscation, the only question remaining is whether or not the individual owning the weapon would be allowed to subsequently register the weapon.

    This is not rocket science. It is not a national or state crisis. It it simply a solution to an arrogant lot who believes the right to violate existing laws is available to all who simply wish to violate existing laws.

    Comment by H-W Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 12:29 pm

  16. “Hence, the ISP would “logically” conclude the weapon was not registered by the person who possesses it, and thus would be expected to confiscate the unregistered, illegal weapon”

    In this rather scary scenario, just how would the ISP engage in the confiscation of said weapons?

    Comment by Donnie Elgin Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 12:43 pm

  17. Just check the the DeVore list…they said.

    Comment by Dotnonymous x Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 12:46 pm

  18. This wouldn’t be a problem @Donnie if people just followed the law. But the “patriots” have let everyone know that they have no intention of being law abiding citizens. That’s what makes them “patriots” right?

    Comment by Demoralized Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 2:24 pm

  19. @ Donnie Elgin

    I am not sure why you are scared by the idea of the state police protecting and serving the people. But that is your issue.

    How would the state police go about confiscating said weapons?

    Upon their discovery during enforcement of other laws.

    Duh.

    Comment by H-W Friday, Nov 3, 23 @ 3:13 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.