Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Pretty much everything you needed to know about catalytic converter thefts
Next Post: Former candidate facing felony charges for allegedly filing false petition signatures
Posted in:
* Illinois’ Fifth District Appellate Court…
Held: The circuit court’s order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory judgment
is affirmed where the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.Plaintiffs, consisting of 45 individuals employed by the Illinois Department of Corrections, appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint for declaratory judgment based on the court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we affirm.
On April 14, 2022, plaintiffs filed their amended verified complaint requesting a declaratory judgment based on section 2 of the Department of Public Health Act (20 ILCS 2305/2 (West 2020)), against defendants, the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) and the Illinois Department of Central Management Services (CMS). The complaint alleged that CMS managed the employment relationship with state employees on behalf of IDOC and Governor Pritzker demanded state employees be vaccinated or tested to limit the spread of COVID, “subject to bargaining.” The complaint alleged that plaintiffs’ union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), engaged in interest arbitration with the State, which resulted in a final opinion and award as to how Governor Pritzker’s directive would be handled. The complaint further alleged that, pursuant to the final opinion, if state employees refused to submit to vaccination or testing, their livelihood was threatened as they could be placed on “no-pay administrative leave” into perpetuity or until the employee complied. […]
While plaintiffs claim the issue is one of statutory rights, the first count of their complaint requested a declaratory judgment stating that defendants had no lawful authority to compel plaintiffs to vaccinate or participate in testing. However, this issue, i.e., “the lawful authority of the employer,” was the basis of the December 29, 2021, interim interest arbitration award. In re Arbitration Between State of Illinois & AFSCME Council 31, No. S-MA- 22-121 (Dec. 29, 2021). The interim decision found it was “long and well established that governmental entities can mandate vaccinations.” […]
While plaintiffs claim the State violated their statutory rights under section 2 of the Health Act and their claims thereunder were not precluded by the arbitration award, we disagree. Plaintiffs’ argument ignores well-established law holding that waiver of a statutory right is a permissive subject of bargaining. […]
The default for any negotiation is that required by the statute; however, thereafter, “the Union may waive its rights on its own accord.” Accordingly, we find that plaintiffs’ claimed rights herein were waived pursuant to AFSCME’s request, and the State’s agreement, to submit the issue of mandatory vaccination to interest arbitration. Further, any dispute contesting the union’s waiver of the employee’s rights would be considered an “unfair labor practice” claim which lies within the province of the Illinois Labor Relations Board.
Tom DeVore and his firm filed this suit in Christian County last year.
…Adding… Here’s something I didn’t know. Darren Bailey walked away from his lawsuit against Gov. Pritzker last year…
12/13/2022
Entry Regarding Administrative ReviewCase comes on for administrative review. Mr. DeVore was allowed to withdraw as attorney of record on 5/23/22 and Mr. Bailey was given 21 days to obtain new counsel. No attorney has entered their appearance nor has this case been prosecuted since April of 2022. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Case closed cause stricken.
Judge: GRISCHOW Reporter: N Clerk: N
Cause Stricken
Status: Cause Stricken Report: Terminated Dec 13, 2022
Civil Division Case Closed
Status: Cause Stricken Report: Terminated Dec 13, 2022
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 9:27 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Pretty much everything you needed to know about catalytic converter thefts
Next Post: Former candidate facing felony charges for allegedly filing false petition signatures
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Not really a “DeVore loss” if he got paid up up front by the plaintiffs.
His model appears to be: 1) put out a call for suckers, 2) collect the cash, 3) file the frivolous lawsuit, 4) lose. Losing would seem to be an important part of the process because it limits the time he has to spend in the courtroom which, in turn, allows him more time to find his next group of marks.
Comment by Pot calling kettle Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 9:35 am
What did DeVore charge the 45 plaintiffs?
For me, that’s the end game, as DeVore’s losing history is measured by me by the cash he earned to lose.
You read these rulings and the logic to where the law is and applied, it’s a glaring example why “case shopping” is the first line to cash the certified monies DeVore enjoys
Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 9:36 am
“Plaintiffs’ argument ignores well-established law”
Of course it does.
I’m honestly surprised how he has avoided any sanctions at all through these past few years.
I’ve seen pro se plaintiffs handle their filings better than this.
Comment by TheInvisibleMan Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 9:48 am
“and his firm”
…of Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe.
Comment by Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 10:07 am
=== Plaintiffs’ argument ignores well-established law===
This is a pretty standard MAGA thing at this point.
Comment by Candy Dogood Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 10:10 am
Had he simply quit sooner, he could still claim that he didn’t lose (although a ruling of moot is not exactly a win in my mind).
But he persists, and BAM. Grifter loses case while enriching himself.
Comment by H-W Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 10:16 am
The losses are worn by DeVore and the plaintiff’s as a badge of honor as they reinforce the bond shared with their leader who is also routinely experiencing courtroom losses. Airing your grievances amongst your followers and like minded individuals is the GOP brand these days. DeVore knows that and he’s simply giving the people what they want.
Comment by Pundent Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 10:19 am
He could always appeal to the Soros/Madigan controlled Illinois Supreme Court. /snark/
Comment by JoanP Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 11:05 am
“His model appears to be…”
PCK’s assessment is flawless, imho.
– MrJM
Comment by @misterjayem Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 11:39 am
== if state employees refused to submit to vaccination or testing, their livelihood was threatened ==
As it should have been then, and still should be even with all the emergency orders over. Even the annual flu shots need to be required for all state employees plus whatever boosters we may receive in the future. Or else.
Comment by Stuck in Celliniland Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 12:26 pm
=Even the annual flu shots need to be required for all state employees plus whatever boosters we may receive in the future.=
Ridiculous suggestions that would never see the light of day only provide fodder to DeVore and his supporters.
Comment by Pundent Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 1:23 pm
==Even the annual flu shots need to be required for all state employees plus whatever boosters we may receive in the future.==
Seeing how you won’t ever be in a crowd ever again that’s a pretty bold statement, Cotton. Flu shots have never been mandated for state employees and yet our society seems to go on in good order with voluntary vaccination.
Comment by don the legend Friday, Jun 9, 23 @ 2:07 pm