Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* Here you go…

posted by Isabel Miller
Friday, May 26, 23 @ 7:44 am

Comments

  1. ===* Daily Herald | If Bears’ plan means widening Wilke, don’t expect money from Rolling Meadows, alderman says:===

    I really don’t think the Bears had any clue what they were doing the minute they bought that land and the real issues needing to be addressed with stakeholders.

    So grossly inept. So many loose ends.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:19 am

  2. OW - Maybe the Arlington Heights plan was being handled by the Vice President in Charge of Finding Us a Great Quarterback.

    Comment by West Side the Best Side Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:25 am

  3. ===Maybe the Arlington Heights plan was being handled by the Vice President in Charge of Finding Us a Great Quarterback.===

    True.

    Once proven a failed mission, why not take on another failed thing?

    Consistency, sure.

    :)

    Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:27 am

  4. Aaron Rodgers boulevard has a nice ring to it.

    Comment by Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:39 am

  5. Hard for me to feel bad for Brad Schneider here. That’s a “lie down with dogs” kind of situation.

    Comment by Larry Bowa Jr. Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:45 am

  6. *Hard for me to feel bad for Brad Schneider here. That’s a “lie down with dogs” kind of situation.*

    Not really. It made sense under the old map and pre-Trump dynamics. It seems like he is carefully extricating himself.

    Comment by Torco Sign Friday, May 26, 23 @ 8:58 am

  7. Re: Politico Story

    No Labels (and Third Way) seem to misunderstand the important of growing consensus over time. Jumping straight into the Presidential Election with a “unity ticket” is in fact never going to be successful until you can start showing that you can win elections at a lower tier of governance.

    It is one thing for Democrats and Republicans who are already elected by their parties to say they will caucus across the aisle to find common ground (as Democrats and Republicans).

    It is quite another to create a fourth party ticket (let us not forget the Libertarian Party), and jump straight into a winner-take-all national election.

    Win a few Congressional seats first. Then win some more in pivotal districts. Then win a Senate seat or two. After that, then you may be able to convince Democrats (an maybe even some Republicans) to vote for a third party.

    But at present, in the modern era, no third party candidate has been successful since at least as far back as Anderson in 1980 (my earliest memory of a strong independent candidate).

    Comment by H-W Friday, May 26, 23 @ 9:26 am

  8. To keep my comment IL-centric, Rep. Brad Schneider (D-IL) is justified in questioning the potential of a unity party at this moment in history, by my estimate.

    Comment by H-W Friday, May 26, 23 @ 9:30 am

  9. Third party Presidential candidates are nothing more than disruptive ways to alter election outcomes without having any credible chance of succeeding. The electoral college system is simply too big of an obstacle to overcome. If Democrats or Republicans politicians don’t like their respective nominees they need to work within their parties to address that.

    Comment by Pundent Friday, May 26, 23 @ 9:38 am

  10. “The electoral college system is simply too big of an obstacle ”

    Thankfully the framework of the EC is enshrined in the constitution and the 12 Amendment. While flawed it has a great balancing impact on presidential elections, which is essential in a constitutional republic of 50 states that vary greatly in population and political leaning.

    Comment by Donnie Elgin Friday, May 26, 23 @ 10:24 am

  11. ===The electoral college system is simply too big of an obstacle to overcome===

    The electoral college is going exactly as it was designed

    To empower the minority opportunity to stifle majority rule, and allow southern states, (now Red states) the opportunity to lead the executive, even if that minority vote total wins the electoral college.

    The GOP can’t afford to end the electoral college.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, May 26, 23 @ 10:32 am

  12. “It made sense under the old map”

    Nothing personal but I’m going to have to hold out for some evidence here.

    “pre-Trump dynamics.”

    He joined ‘problem solvers’ caucus in 2017.

    Comment by Larry Bowa Jr. Friday, May 26, 23 @ 10:37 am

  13. =The GOP can’t afford to end the electoral college.=

    100% accurate. It is what allowed them to get control of federal courts. Montana, Wyoming, N and S Dakota, Iowa, Idaho, Kansas and Utah give the GOP their power even as their electorate shrinks. It has become a problem, but one that will be nearly impossible to fix.

    Comment by JS Mill Friday, May 26, 23 @ 10:45 am

  14. Brad Schneider being criticized for supporting a democratic process. No labels real doesn’t know what they are talking about .

    Comment by Tinman Friday, May 26, 23 @ 11:49 am

  15. Larry Bowa, Jr., it’s not very complicated — Schneider’s district used to be more competitive before Trump. North Shore Republicans were a thing but the Republican brand is completely different now so working with Republicans is per se different and less politically necessary. It was not always the case for the district when Schneider was running.

    Comment by Torco Sign Friday, May 26, 23 @ 12:14 pm

  16. =While flawed it has a great balancing impact on presidential elections, which is essential in a constitutional republic of 50 states that vary greatly in population and political leaning.=

    The “flaw” of electing candidates that the majority oppose is a pretty big one.

    Comment by Pundent Friday, May 26, 23 @ 12:18 pm

  17. ===While flawed===

    No.

    It works EXACTLY as designed. A minority party still in mathematical proximity to “ruling” the majority.

    “While flawed”… lol

    ===North Shore Republicans were a thing but the Republican brand is completely different now so working with Republicans is per se different and less politically necessary. It was not always the case for the district when Schneider was running.===

    The Republican brand is toxic and less identify as such, no need to include such when their shrinking brand is so toxic, the incorporating them loses more votes than it gains.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, May 26, 23 @ 12:29 pm

  18. With yesterday’s ruling from the Supreme Court regarding real estate tax sales and forfeitures I would suggest that you he state is going to have to completely redo its tax sales rather than “rebalance” it

    Comment by DuPage Saint Friday, May 26, 23 @ 3:07 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.