Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Awake Illinois releases its school board endorsements
Next Post: Live coverage

Afternoon roundup

Posted in:

* From Heather Wier Vaught’s excellent weekend newsletter

LEGISLATIVE

Schedule: Both chambers met [last] week. Friday was the Third Reading deadline in the Senate, and they finished early in the day without any major incidents. In total, the Senate passed 265 bills over to the House, and the House passed 443 bills to the Senate. Members will be back in their district offices for the next two weeks, and both chambers reconvene April 18-20.

Senate Hearings on Chicago Elected School Board: The General Assembly is tasked with drawing districts for the soon-to-be elected Chicago Board of Education. The Senate’s Special Committee on the Chicago Elected Representative School Board will hold hearings throughout Chicago April 5 through 17 to gather public input. The public may provide in-person testimony, submit written testimony, or submit witness slips in advance of the hearings via email at ChicagoERSBCommittee@senatedem.ilga.gov.

House Appropriations-Higher Education Procurement Subcommittee: House Appropriations-Higher Education Committee Chair, LaShawn Ford, announced the creation of a new subcommittee aimed at examining equity and inclusion in university procurements. Chairman Ford stated in a press release, “There is disparity in the number of contracts awarded to Black, Brown, and women contractors,” “The subcommittee would be examining what policies, if any, lead these institutions to not award contracts equitably, or if they hold standards that could dissuade companies from pursuing project bids.” Illinois has some of the most robust procurement laws in the country, and contractors and vendors often find the process difficult to navigate. Last year the General Assembly created a new Task Force on Procurement to undertake a comprehensive review of procurement laws and policies, including those that apply to universities. Universities are subject to the provisions of the Procurement Code and oversight by the Chief Procurement Officer for Higher Education.

Mary Gill Appointed to the House: Mary Gill was appointed to fill the vacancy of State Representative Fran Hurley, who Governor Pritzker appointed to the State Labor Relations Board. Gill is the Executive Director of the Mt. Greenwood Community and Business Association (MGCBA).

JUDICIAL

Plaintiffs in Assault Weapon Case Move to Disqualify Justices: Plaintiffs in the assault weapon ban case before the Illinois Supreme Court moved to disqualify Justices Elizabeth Rochford and Mary Kay O’Brien based on campaign contributions from Governor Pritzker, Speaker Welch, and attorneys representing President Harmon. Candidates for the judiciary are prohibited from soliciting or accepting campaign funds themselves, rather contributions to judicial candidate committees must be solicited and accepted by others. The Act being challenged was passed after the 2022 election, and contributions to the committees supporting the new justices were publicly available. Plaintiffs chose to named the Governor, Speaker, and President as defendants in the case, and now seek to use the named defendants as justification for the recusal of the two recently-elected justices.

This is not the first time campaign contributions have been used to attempt to disqualify justices in high profile cases. In 2005, plaintiffs in Avery v State Farm moved to disqualify then recently-elected Justice Lloyd Karmeier citing campaign contributions the committee supporting Karmeier received from State Farm and its employees. Justice Karmeier stated he would not recuse himself and the court denied the motion as moot. In 2014, plaintiffs in Price v Philip Morris moved to disqualify Justice Karmeier for the same contributions. Justice Karmeier wrote a 16-page opinion explaining his reasoning for not recusing, relying heavily on the rule of necessity, which holds that absent a clear reason to recuse a justice should hear a case, and no member of the court sought his recusal. He ultimately participated in both cases, in which billions of dollars were at stake for all parties in the case. Unlike the plaintiffs in Avery or Price, none of the defendants in this case have any financial interest in the outcome of the pending lawsuit, merely policy and political interests. More here.

* More…

posted by Isabel Miller
Monday, Apr 3, 23 @ 2:33 pm

Comments

  1. Regular watchdog groups like the Center for American Progress, the Brennan Center for Justice, Public Citizen, and Chicago Appleseed, will be falling over themselves to file amici briefs in favor of recusals in this case for sure…

    Comment by HipHopCracy Tuesday, Apr 4, 23 @ 7:42 am

  2. …crickets…

    Comment by HipHopCracy Tuesday, Apr 4, 23 @ 7:43 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Awake Illinois releases its school board endorsements
Next Post: Live coverage


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.