Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: A false equivalence, but somebody should still probably pick up a phone
Posted in:
* Sun-Times headline…
Juul Labs, target of $440 million settlement, has given Illinois pols over $120,000 since 2020
* Sub-headline…
Illinois House Speaker Emanuel ‘Chris’ Welch has been a major recipient of the company’s giving, campaign-finance records show.
* Lede…
Juul Labs — the e-cigarette giant that just agreed to a nearly $440 million settlement with states around the country that accused it of hooking minors on vaping and masking its dangers — has given more than $120,000 to Illinois politicians’ campaign funds since 2020, records show.
* Scroll way down almost to the end…
In February 2021, two bills were introduced in Illinois taking aim at e-cigarettes and were overwhelmingly approved by legislators and signed into law in August 2021 by Gov. J.B. Pritzker.
One of the laws “prohibits the use of cartoons, video game characters and popular children’s media to promote e-cigarette products.” It also forbids sellers from marketing e-cigarettes as a “low-risk product.”
A companion law allows regulators “to conduct compliance checks of retailers . . . to investigate whether such retailers are selling tobacco products, alternative nicotine products or e-cigarettes to persons under 21 years of age.”
Among the sponsors was state Sen. Christopher Belt, D-East St. Louis, who took two campaign contributions, in 2020 and 2021, totaling $2,500, from Juul, campaign-finance records show. Belt couldn’t be reached.
* OK, not one Democratic legislator singled out in that story voted against either of those bills that whacked the vape industry. The only “No” votes on either bill were by Republican Reps. Frese, Halbrook, Jacobs, McCombie, Miller (no relation), Niemerg and Wilhour. They’re not mentioned in the story.
Rep. Jacobs received $16,250 from Juul parent company Altria, Rep. Freese received $5,000 from Altria and Rep. Halbrook received $1,500 from the company. The company gave $156,250 to House Republican caucus committees. Juul has given $10K to House Republican organizations, including $5,000 when Rep. McCombie chaired the HRO. None of those contributions were mentioned. Whatever. They’re in the super-minority, but still.
* Now, maybe those contributions to the super-majority Democrats lessened the impact of those bills. I have no idea, and, according to the above article, neither does the Sun-Times. So, perhaps the headline should be that most legislators who received money from Altria/Juul followed the Molly Ivins/Jesse Unruh maxim about legislating, which is an expanded version of the headline on this post.
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 9:49 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: A false equivalence, but somebody should still probably pick up a phone
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Money equals speech so I have no problem with the donations or how the legislators responded.
Comment by Donnie Elgin Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 10:06 am
The old saw is that donations buy you access, not a vote. You get a chance to make your case, but frankly if you can’t convince them that there’s more votes your way then the other way, you’re not gonna get ‘em.
Comment by Arsenal Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 10:14 am
Feeling betrayed by a politician indicates a general ignorance of the animal.
Comment by Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 10:26 am
It just doesn’t seem like $120,000 over a couple years is all that much to make a big deal about
Comment by Curious citizen Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 10:36 am
there was a great quote in the west wing by Allen Alda, “If you can’t drink their booze, eat their food and tell them to go to hell, you don’t belong in this business.
And every side of the conversation knows the deal. The money is good so long as the sins of the giver are small. Once they cross the line, no level of money can save you from someone who needs to stand for re-election.
Comment by frsutrated GOP Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 10:51 am
Neither “Juul” or parent company “Altria” sound like names for a deadly product, eh?
Sometimes… people give me money for nothing…just because.
Comment by Dotnonymous Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 11:14 am
Jacobs…talk about ineffective.
Comment by Hamlet on the Potomac Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 12:48 pm
Politics is a money game, and the lobbyists apparently didn’t spend enough to gain enough influence, unlike others (*cough* ComEd *cough*).
Comment by thisjustinagain Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 12:56 pm
= (*cough* ComEd *cough*).=
And now *cough* the are *cough, cough* being prosecuted.
Comment by JS Mill Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 1:10 pm
Access is the value.
“Never take the money” when the ties bring something other than advocacy.
Lobbyists crave access. If money is access… it’s when it’s more than access.
Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 1:24 pm
=== Money equals speech… ===
Not in my book, pal. What it is is an anonymous bullhorn that drowns out free speech by people who actually put themselves out in the public square to be heard. We need to legislate the horrible Citizen’s United decision out of existence.
Comment by PublicServant Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 3:13 pm
PublicServant — none of these contributions are related to Citizens United.
Comment by SaulGoodman Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 3:29 pm
=== none of these contributions are related to Citizens United. ===
They served as impetus for my rant, however, and I stand by it.
Comment by PublicServant Friday, Sep 9, 22 @ 3:37 pm