Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: It’s good to be the king
Next Post: As expected, Illinois will lose one congressional seat
Posted in:
* Center Square…
A new study by the nonpartisan Illinois Policy Institute reveals that police contracts are hindering internal investigations, making it difficult for police chiefs to get rid of problem officers.
Illinois labor law contains a provision that elevates collective bargaining agreements above state law. Section 15, included in the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, states union-negotiated contracts override all other state laws and regulations.
Analysis by IPI found the 10 largest municipalities in Illinois, outside Chicago, all have provisions in their police collective bargaining agreements that would supersede internal investigations and officer discipline. They include Joliet, Rockford, Springfield, Champaign, Naperville, Peoria, Aurora, Elgin, Waukegan and Cicero. […]
Two bills are making their way through Springfield addressing union contracts. House Bill 3891 would exclude police union contracts from the language in Section 15, meaning those contracts would no longer have more power than state laws. House Bill 3892 would limit negotiation by police unions to compensation only, preventing contracts from including disciplinary provisions.
Um, the bills are basically dead. They were both assigned to subcommittees and are now back in the Rules Committee where they will likely remain.
* Sticking with this topic for a bit, this is from the Capitol Fax subscriber edition on Sunday, January 10, 2021…
Most of the Senate Executive Committee testimony yesterday against the Black Caucus’ criminal justice reform bill was either way over the top or not exactly helpful to their cause.
“Do you want to stop law enforcement from finding murdered children?” asked one police chief, who pointed to phone call and police interview mandates in the bill which he claimed would’ve prevented officers from finding the dead body of AJ Freund “as quickly as they did.”
The Illinois Sheriffs’ Association has been claiming the bill would “de-fund the police,” and some Republican legislators have shared the claim on their social media accounts. The bill would, in reality, reduce a local government’s share of its state income tax proceeds if it didn’t comply with a police body cam mandate. The Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police didn’t go that far, but did claim at the hearing that the bill would “de-fund” municipalities.
The Illinois Municipal League testified against several aspects of the bill, including the “end prison gerrymandering” section. The group pointed out that counting prisoners at their last known addresses instead of at their prisons would reduce Local Government Distributive Fund dollars to (mainly Republican) prison host communities. But the flip side of that coin is the change would also increase LGDF funding for Democratic Chicago and Cook County.
Sean Smoot was one of the only opponents who seemed to know how to tailor his appeal to a Democratic super-majority. Smoot is the director of the Police Benevolent & Protective Association of Illinois, and he focused much of his testimony on the section that would eliminate discipline and discharge procedures from collective bargaining.
He said he wasn’t talking about protecting bad cops. “I’ve had the opportunity to represent officers who were being discriminated against because they were women,” Smoot said. “I’ve had the opportunity to represent officers who were being discriminated and disciplinarily discriminated [against] because of who they loved.” Smoot said he represented an officer in the Metro East area “who they attempted to terminate because he was Black.”
I don’t know if he succeeded or not, and threatening to scare the living daylights out of white voters has always been an effective tactic. But at least Smoot recognized who runs the Senate, didn’t try to bully anybody and seemed to be sensitive to the insanity this country and this state have just been through. We need more like him.
I shared that as a preface to this scintillating analysis from the Patch…
State lawmakers with Chicago Teachers Union cash jammed in their campaign war chests keep pushing bills in Springfield focused on providing union bosses more bargaining power and a lower threshold of member support required to go on strike.
Meanwhile, proposed legislation that would address police union contracts with provisions that remain roadblocks to criminal justice reform have been getting swept into the dark corners of the legislative session.
Yeah, it’s really tough to see why pro-union bills are being advanced in the Democratic super-majority GA while bills perceived as anti-union are not going anywhere this session. Also, the criminal justice reform law sets up a task force to make recommendations for future legislation. Here’s a statement from last week from Rep. Justin Slaughter, the House’s point-person on criminal justice reform…
When our General Assembly passed the historic police reform package in January, we made a commitment to form a task force that would continue these conversations deliberately and inclusively. The goal of the Task Force on Constitutional Rights and Remedies is to produce a report that clearly outlines how we better hold police accountable, and allow all stakeholders to operate from the same set of facts. We remain committed to moving these discussions forward, not only with the legislature but with communities across the state.
* This was certainly odd…
Three suburban Democratic lawmakers’ “present” votes temporarily halted legislation aimed at curbing gun violence in Illinois because of a disagreement over who could petition authorities for someone’s guns to be temporarily confiscated under a firearm restraining order.
House Bill 1092 is expected to come up for a vote again once the Democrats agree.
State Rep. Kathleen Willis of Addison, who worked for years on this issue, said she did not vote yes because the new bill altered the definition of a “family member” who could file such a petition to include “any former spouse (or) person with whom the respondent has or allegedly has a child in common.”
“We worked really hard” on the original wording, Willis said. “We had concerns that we did not want this to become a vindictive thing that someone could use in a divorce situation or just because you don’t like your neighbor or something like that.”
I dunno. Seems like there’s more to this than that.
* SJ-R…
The Illinois House passed a bill Friday which would make COVID-19-related expansions to telehealth services permanent through state statute.
House Bill 3498, introduced by Rep. Deb Conroy, D-Villa Park, aims to reduce barriers in access to virtual and telehealth services and would bring standards for virtual care in line with physical health services.
Conroy said that access to telehealth, which became a necessity for many Illinoisans during the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic last year, would bring lasting benefits in managing chronic health conditions.
“Over the last year, we’ve seen firsthand evidence that telehealth preserves quality and safety, meets individual patient needs, decreases health care disparities, and protects public health,” Conroy said Friday.
Conroy’s telehealth bill failed to pass during last May’s truncated special session, but she’s worked it hard ever since.
* More…
* Illinois General Assembly passes hundreds of bills as session end approaches
* Illinois House passes gender-neutral bathroom bill, mandate to remove lead from drinking water
* Illinois House backs replacement of brain-damaging lead service lines, but wants Biden and Congress to pay for the work
* Illinois House backs bill that would make Juneteenth an official state holiday after Senate passes its version
* Senate passes journalism task force bill to help rural communities
* Windhorst’s Bill May Help Fill Teaching Vacancies
* Illinois Senate approves bill creating permanent council to protect Mahomet Aquifer
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 1:34 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: It’s good to be the king
Next Post: As expected, Illinois will lose one congressional seat
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
chor·tle
/CHôrdl/
verb
past tense: chortled; past participle: chortled
1. laugh in a breathy, gleeful way; chuckle.
2. The proper response when someone refers to IPI as “nonpartisan”.
Comment by Commisar Gritty Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 1:56 pm
My wife is an NP. She hates telehealth. She only finds that telehealth is good in that she can now bill insurance to make a phone call to tell a patient about their test results and it can now be called an appointment. In the past it was just another uncompensated service. But for real health issues, either you need to be seen in person (by someone) or its not that bad.
Comment by Unionman Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 2:01 pm
It’s an absolute joke that you continue to share articles by Center Square, a “news” organization funded by IPI, especially after starting a story by referring to IPI as “nonpartisan”
Comment by Anne Onymous Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 2:02 pm
===It’s an absolute joke that you===
My readers are mostly sophisticated enough to understand what’s going on. If you need your hand held, go somewhere else.
Comment by Rich Miller Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 2:04 pm
At first I was confused why IPI (Centersquare, whatever) was going after police, but then they started talking about unions, and it clicked. You can’t say they don’t stay on message
Comment by Perrid Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 2:26 pm
the tele-health option is incredible. As a parent of 3 kids i’ve probably avoided 9 unnecessary trips to a doctors office. Service is quicker, prescriptions are quicker. Nothing to dislike
Comment by Merica Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 3:09 pm
Telehealth is a good option for many services and could/should alleviate some strain on the health system for those that do need in person services.
Comment by OurMagician Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 4:03 pm
The failure of those bills to advance is a temporary set back. When considering the age and tenure of the state level leaders of various labor unions and the AFL-CIO it is pretty clear that the clock will run down on the desire to protect bad cops at the expense of allowing your members to continue to be oppressed.
The legislature has passed something that is best a half measure. Unless the police in this state and across the nation are going to cease with the summary executions of people of color and murders of unarmed people in general. This will continue to be an issue and it is unlikely that their half measure will have enough results to point at and declare a success.
Some labor leaders are going to wind up with shorter tenures than they expected. Some members of the legislature are going to find that when they return to their district that the folks behind the energy of this movement have not lost any of the passion and that their bill won’t pass the smell test.
Comment by Candy Dogood Monday, Apr 26, 21 @ 8:47 pm