Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: 3,369 new confirmed and probable cases; 22 additional deaths; 2,112 hospitalized; 506 in ICU; 3.6 percent average case positivity rate; 4.3 percent test positivity rate; 118,741 average daily doses
Next Post: Times change and so do political parties
Posted in:
* Press release from earlier this week…
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc., the third largest video gaming terminal operator in Illinois, announced today a settlement with the Illinois Gaming Board (IGB), including dismissal of a 2019 disciplinary complaint without any finding of wrongdoing. The IGB unanimously approved the agreement at its meeting this morning in Chicago. The agreement provides for renewal of Gold Rush’s license retroactive to February of this year, continuing Gold Rush’s consistent good standing.
“After 18 months of denying false accusations from adversaries and fighting to protect my business, my family, and my reputation, I’m grateful that the IGB closely reviewed and considered the facts and evidence demonstrating that I did not offer an illegal inducement as the disciplinary complaint alleged,” said Rick Heidner, Gold Rush’s founder.
According to the settlement agreement, Gold Rush and Mr. Heidner fully cooperated during the IGB’s investigation. In addition to dismissing the disciplinary complaint, the agreement calls for Gold Rush and Mr. Heidner to dismiss two lawsuits they filed last year against the IGB. Gold Rush will pay the IGB $45,000 to cover its administrative and investigative costs associated with the disciplinary complaint. The company will also pay a $30,000 fine for disparaging text messages unrelated to the disciplinary complaint that Mr. Heidner sent in July 2019 to an adversary in litigation.
Gold Rush denied the allegations made in the disciplinary complaint and contested the request to revoke Gold Rush’s terminal operator license. The complaint alleged that Mr. Heidner violated state law and IGB rules by offering to help arrange a purchase of certain video gaming establishments for $5 million more than a recent purchaser had paid for them in a November 2018 transaction.
That transaction, or series of transactions, on Nov. 16, 2018, among three other Illinois video gaming licensees – Laredo Hospitality Ventures, LLC, Illinois Café and Service Company, LLC (ICSC), and Midwest SRO, LLC – resulted in ICSC’s purported purchase of Laredo and its more than 60 Stella’s and Shelby’s gaming establishments. At the time, Gold Rush had contracts to serve as the terminal operator for 44 of the owned establishments and was being forced out. Mr. Heidner, who was suspicious but unaware of the transaction details at the time, contends that he was merely attempting to elicit the financial details of the deal when he engaged in conversation later that same month with Dan Fischer, principal of ICSC, which owns and operates the Dotty’s chain of video gaming cafes.
“The settlement vindicates Gold Rush and Mr. Heidner on the allegations that were charged in the disciplinary complaint,” said Patrick M. Collins, of King & Spalding, an attorney for Gold Rush and Mr. Heidner. “We believe the disciplinary complaint was issued in reaction to misleading media reports, but we are grateful that the IGB ultimately was persuaded by the facts to dismiss the complaint and approve a fair and reasonable settlement.”
Meanwhile, the IGB continues to investigate ICSC’s purported purchase of Laredo. In pending litigation relating to the November 2018 transaction, it was revealed that a Gold Rush competitor, Midwest SRO, had paid more than $44.5 million to the owners of the Laredo establishments before being awarded contracts with them to replace Gold Rush. At the same time, ICSC paid only $2 million, and possibly much less, to purportedly purchase Laredo and its more than 60 high-end cafes.
Gold Rush contends that the transaction was a “sham” designed to circumvent gaming laws prohibiting inducements and integrated ownership of terminal operators and establishments. In December 2020, a Cook County Circuit Court judge opined that he viewed the transaction as “highly suspect.” Internal IGB documents produced in the litigation likewise disclosed that the agency’s professional staff had grave concerns about the deal before it was completed, but believed they lacked authority to stop the transaction. In June 2020, the IGB advised the Court that it was investigating the transaction, and it recently signaled that the investigation is continuing when it told a judge last month in a different case that: “The Laredo Transaction calls into question whether certain applicants are qualified to be granted a video gaming license.”
“We appreciate the significant time spent by the IGB in resolving this matter in a fair and equitable manner, especially during a period when the IGB is extremely busy and has many demands for its attention, yet is understaffed. Nevertheless, we encourage the IGB to continue to invest the resources necessary to conclude its ongoing investigation and provide the industry with direction on issues that will influence future transactions and relationships,” said Paul T. Jenson, of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, an attorney for Gold Rush and Mr. Heidner.
The IGB today also approved a separate agreement providing that the agency will rescind an order directing Gold Rush and its Director of Operations, Ronald Bolger, to economically disassociate. That order was announced by the Board at the same time as the 2019 disciplinary complaint. Mr. Bolger, a widely respected 40-year veteran of the coin-operated amusement and video gaming industries in Illinois, remains Gold Rush’s operations director.
* Sun-Times…
That agency’s administrator, Marcus Fruchter, moved to revoke Heidner’s gambling license in December 2019, claiming Heidner had offered up a $5 million “illegal inducement” to the owner of a gambling parlor chain that planned to remove Heidner’s slots. State gambling law prohibits “giving anything of value to an establishment as an incentive” to use a company’s machines.
But more than a year into the case, new evidence “added clarity and context to the events underlying the disciplinary complaint,” Fruchter said before Gaming Board members unanimously approved the settlement.
Heidner had maintained the allegations were part of an “orchestrated smear campaign” by Dan Fischer, a competitor who remains in a heated legal battle with Heidner. Court records stemming from that ongoing lawsuit show Gaming Board investigators are now considering discipline against Fischer, who’s also the lead investor in a group that has received preliminary approval to break ground on a new casino in Rockford. […]
Heidner was put under the microscope in October 2019 when his name surfaced in a federal search warrant connected to a sweeping public corruption probe that has ensnared several top state lawmakers. That summer, federal agents went looking for items related to Heidner and Gold Rush, among other entities, when they raided the offices of then-state Sen. Martin Sandoval and McCook Mayor Jeff Tobolski. […]
But last summer, Chicago’s top federal prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Lausch, took the rare step of signing a letter confirming Heidner was “not a target of this investigation.”
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 12:50 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: 3,369 new confirmed and probable cases; 22 additional deaths; 2,112 hospitalized; 506 in ICU; 3.6 percent average case positivity rate; 4.3 percent test positivity rate; 118,741 average daily doses
Next Post: Times change and so do political parties
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Give him back his Tinley Park Racino, Governor.
Comment by me Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 1:09 pm
“But last summer, Chicago’s top federal prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Lausch, took the rare step of signing a letter confirming Heidner was “not a target of this investigation.”
But while one Trump appointee give him a gold star the G is FL seemed to have other ideas.
Sorta like the LaHood scandal…one G dozes while another files a guilty plea and collects a $40K fine.
Comment by Annonin' Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 1:16 pm
=Give him back his Tinley Park Racino, Governor.=
Agreen, this makes sense. Why should Illinois lose the entire harness racing industry, when it employs thousands and there are many Illinois breeders?
Heidner was prepared to build a harness race track with casino inside, as envisioned by the 2018 state gambling legislation. Since Balmoral Park was closed and Maywood Park’s lease was terminated because the previous owner/lessee contributed to Blago’s delinquency, Chicago area harness racing has been limited to 5 summer months a year at Hawthorne, which prefers thoroughbred dates, but accepts the winter thoroughbred leftover dates surrounding Arlington’s summer thoroughbred meet.
Now Churchill Downs is planning to close Arlington in 2022 and sell to developers, which would enable Hawthorne to offer the year round thoroughbred racing it wants, but leaving northern Illinois without a harness racing venue. The Tinley Park racino would fill that looming gap, and was only halted because of the allegations against its developer, which have now been dismissed.
Comment by James Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 1:32 pm
So the feds and gaming board sabotaged a man’s name, reputation, business, and life? Sounds about par for the course.
Comment by ;) Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 1:35 pm
Clearing Heidner of one business conflict with another shady gambling operator doesn’t absolve the fact his entire operation was backed by the same banker that sunk the Rosemont deal because of his mob connections. None of which was disclosed to the gaming board. If the board wants to let him continue operating fine, but it is not a good idea to hand a racino over to him. Just ask Frank Thomas about his deal with Heidner in Berwyn. Heidner is still profiting. Frank Thomas lost a lot of money there.
Comment by woahwoah Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 2:25 pm
Which might explain.
Temporary casino plans for Rockford hit roadblock
https://www.mystateline.com/news/local-news/temporary-casino-plans-for-rockford-hit-roadblock/
Comment by sal-says Friday, Apr 23, 21 @ 2:27 pm