Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list

Mendoza won’t deduct fines from tax refunds for low and moderate income Illinoisans

Posted in:

* Press release…

Low-to-moderate-income Illinois taxpayers will not have unpaid fines deducted from their state income tax refunds this year as families struggle to deal with the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, Illinois State Comptroller Susana A. Mendoza announced Monday.

“Families on the edge are counting on their state income tax refunds to pay bills they have been putting off as COVID-19 cost them jobs or increased their medical bills,” Comptroller Mendoza said.

This is decisive action that will provide relief to families that are struggling the most from the pandemic. Statewide, Earned Income Tax Credit eligible taxpayers will have access to an estimated $15 million that would have been intercepted. This comes as a result of collaboration between the Comptroller, Chicago Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot, and advocacy groups that asked for relief for these families, who are standing together for a news conference Monday.

“I applaud Comptroller Mendoza for creating welcome financial relief for our working families in Chicago and across Illinois,” Mayor Lightfoot said. “These families have carried the heaviest burden from the COVID-19 crisis with hours cut and jobs lost, and with it, the health care, transportation, and other essentials we rely on to live our daily lives. As we move to put this terrible pandemic behind us, we must do everything in our power to ensure our recovery is equitable and brings everyone into to the success we hope to all share.”

Ten years ago, the Illinois General Assembly gave cities around the state the right to contract with the Comptroller’s office to withhold unpaid traffic and parking ticket fines, and other court judgments from state income tax returns and send those to the towns. The Comptroller already performed that function for other state agencies, garnishing unpaid child support for instance. Those garnishments will continue to be withheld and passed on to the custodial parent.

A year ago, Comptroller Mendoza announced the office would no longer withhold unpaid red-light camera ticket fines from taxpayers’ income-tax refunds. That decision was made because of corruption uncovered in the red-light camera industry resulting in indictments, as well as reports showing connected government officials getting a cut of those fines and the fact that these fines disproportionately impacted poor families. More than 90% of red-light camera tickets in many jurisdictions are not for running through red lights, but rather for failing to make a full stop during a legal right turn on red.

For this tax year, the office will not offset tax refunds going to families or individuals who qualify for the state Earned Income Tax Credit. The state EITC, which is based on the federal EITC, is a widely accepted standard for determining who is considered low-and moderate-income. For the current tax year (2020), a family of four earning $56,844 a year or less or a single person earning $15,820 a year or less qualifies.

All of the families benefitting from this policy change are, by definition, “working class.” If you do not earn income and file a tax return, this policy will not affect you.

“Key to combatting structural inequity is to put more money in the pockets of lower income folks, who are disproportionately people of color. In our economy, wealth creates wealth. Protecting the tax refunds of lower wealth families gives them a chance to build a better life for themselves and their community,” said Brent Adams, senior vice president of policy and communication of Woodstock Institute.

Today’s policy change could affect 41,000 households of the roughly 1 million across the state that qualify for the EITC. The $15 million that they will keep in their refunds will help them get through the pandemic. The average hit to families that are offset is $363 and can involve multiple tickets. Sometimes the fines have doubled. Families count on those income tax refunds to pay for more critical bills, like rent, groceries, and medications.

This change reflects efforts by the City of Chicago and Mayor Lori Lightfoot to tackle regressive fines and fees, from implementing affordable payment plans to eliminating hundreds of millions of dollars in fees related to vehicle impounds. As a member of Cities and Counties for Fine and Fee Justice, a national cohort dedicated to reducing the harm of fines and fees, the city has worked with the community to identify and address harmful practices. Those initial reforms have resulted in numerous people getting their driver’s licenses back, allowing them to work and earn income, as well as a sharp increase in compliance due to people paying into affordable payment plans.

The Comptroller’s office made this decision after reviewing the impact of the program on vulnerable populations and consulting with the City of Chicago and a coalition of advocacy groups including the Chicago Jobs Council, Woodstock Institute, Economic Security for Illinois, the Shriver Center on Poverty Law, the Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice, the Chicago Urban League, the Heartland Alliance, the Illinois Asset Building Group, the Illinois Coalition on Immigrant and Refugee Rights, and POWER-PAC IL, among others that had advocated for this change.

The groups argued persuasively that COVID-19 has been a serious hardship on poor families that are disproportionately impacted by these fines and fees.

“Although families qualifying for the state Earned Income Tax Credit are only about 15% of the state population, they account for 36% of the money withheld from income tax refunds. So, yes, these fines and fees hit them harder,” Mendoza said. “We were happy to work with Mayor Lightfoot’s office and the advocacy groups to make this policy change happen in time for this tax season, for the benefit of poor- and moderate-income families around the state.”

“It’s encouraging to see the Comptroller and the Mayor safeguard the tax refunds that Illinois’ lowest-income workers rely on. We hope their action will inspire the Illinois General Assembly to implement further changes that automate, expand and protect the state earned income tax credit for all of our neighbors who need it most,” said Harish I. Patel, director of Economic Security for Illinois.

The change also provides an opportunity to highlight that approximately 20% of eligible Chicago taxpayers do not take advantage of the EITC, and a 5% increase in uptake among eligible Chicagoans would likely cover more than 19,000 additional families and add over $52 million in economic benefit to families.

“Stopping the seizure of tax returns this year will have an enormous impact on low-wage workers, and particularly workers of color who are hardest hit by fines, fees, and collections practices. These communities have yet to see good jobs return during the pandemic and can utilize this influx of cash to help pay for their families’ needs,” said Mari Castaldi, director of policy and advocacy at the Chicago Jobs Council.

“This is a great start. The community wants to be able to trust government in this time, and to do so requires a focus of care towards communities who are already experiencing severe hardship. Those in positions of power should be making every effort to create policy that puts people on the road to compliance, without causing further harm and hardship,” said Rose Grillier, co-president emeritus of POWER-PAC IL.

Here are a few things the Comptroller’s actions do NOT do:

Today’s action is a narrow, targeted approach to provide COVID-19 pandemic relief to low- and moderate-income families who need help now.

posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 12:51 pm

Comments

  1. Thank you, Comptroller Mendoza. That’s called doing the right thing.

    Comment by west wing Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 1:11 pm

  2. I love that Mendoza gets to pick and choose the laws she wants to follow

    Comment by good luck Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 1:26 pm

  3. Thoughtful governing to people, policy, and circumstances.

    I applaud the Comptroller

    Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 1:27 pm

  4. I’m not comfortable with a Constitutional Officer just ignoring a state law they don’t like.

    Comment by Just Me 2 Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 1:48 pm

  5. Good for her.

    Comment by Cheryl44 Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:14 pm

  6. This is actually a really sad commentary about how much our state and local governments rely on the downtrodden to fill their coffers. Whether it’s relying on problem gamblers, smokers, drug users, people who are running late, or our terribly regressive property tax system. The more you ‘have it together’, the less you seem to pay.

    I roll my eyes when IL politicians stand up and say they’re for the little guy. Watch what they do, not what they say.

    This whole system is broken, no wonder people are leaving.

    Comment by Interesting Dan Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:36 pm

  7. good luck,

    Looking at the statute (15 ILCS 405/10.05d), it seems to be worded with may not has to.

    Comment by cermak_rd Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:43 pm

  8. “Watch what they do, not what they say.”

    So when the comptroller decides to delay the government taking money owed from low-income people during a pandemic and financial crisis, is that not doing something?

    “…no wonder people are leaving.” Yep, it couldn’t be the high property taxes, which are in large part the result of the state not funding education adequately. And when Democrats attempt to do something to fix the state budget so that maybe some day it can afford to pay more for education and thereby reduce property taxes, the Republicans and the wealthy line up to block it.

    The “system” isn’t broken, but it does need a lot of repair. Too bad Republicans have shown themselves to be standing up for the big guys and spitting on the little guys. Sounds like you’re there to join them.

    Comment by Techie Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:50 pm

  9. Thankfully there isn’t a law against baseless comment section whining.

    Comment by Sonny Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:53 pm

  10. “Whether it’s relying on problem gamblers, smokers, drug users, people who are running late, or our terribly regressive property tax system. The more you ‘have it together’, the less you seem to pay”

    But isn’t that a matter of being responsible? The reason we charge speeders (people in a hurry) is to deter people from doing it because it puts other people at risk.

    Which is also the same reason we have sin taxes is that the activity (drugs, cigs or booze) harms the public health and in the case of drugs and booze can endanger others. So we want people to avoid the activity.

    The people who have it together have it enough together to calculate out that it is to their advantage not to speed or to do other activities to excess.

    Comment by cermak_rd Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 2:53 pm

  11. Lightfoot is robbing Peter to pay Paul.

    6 mi/hour speeding tickets are expected to snag $100 million.

    Comment by Juvenal Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 3:20 pm

  12. Illinois municipalities will not be happy, particularly muni’s that operate their own water and sewer systems. Inevitably, they will hire a private debt collection agency which can tap on even more fees/costs to the debt owed.

    Comment by California Guy Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 3:31 pm

  13. ==gets to pick and choose the laws she wants to follow==

    It’s a service the Comptroller’s office can provide. It isn’t required to do so. She isn’t breaking any laws.

    Comment by Demoralized Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 3:48 pm

  14. Menbozo is really trying to get some media these days.

    Comment by Frumpy White Guy Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 5:19 pm

  15. “Whether it’s relying on problem gamblers, smokers, drug users, people who are running late, or our terribly regressive property tax system. The more you ‘have it together’, the less you seem to pay”

    But isn’t that a matter of being responsible? The reason we charge speeders (people in a hurry) is to deter people from doing it because it puts other people at risk.

    Which is also the same reason we have sin taxes is that the activity (drugs, cigs or booze) harms the public health and in the case of drugs and booze can endanger others. So we want people to avoid the activity.

    The people who have it together have it enough together to calculate out that it is to their advantage not to speed or to do other activities to excess.”

    Yep. The best (worst) part Dan, interestingly, is your “people in a hurry” comment. If by that you mean, reckless people with no regard for the lives of others (ring a bell these days?), I wholeheartedly agree.

    Comment by ESR Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 8:08 pm

  16. SO: when Robbins or Harvey doesn’t have enough cash to pay overtime to fix a water main break; citizens in those Communities just use Food Stamps to get Water at Walmart?
    I’m not saying, I’m just saying before we vilify one comment or totally react to another; maybe we pause and take a breath?

    Comment by Joe Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 8:38 pm

  17. This is great. Good governing and good for real people.

    Comment by DuPage Dem Monday, Mar 15, 21 @ 9:47 pm

  18. Great news, @Joe: Robbins and Harvey don’t contract with the Comptroller’s office so no water mains at risk. As @cermak_rd and @Demoralized note, the General Assembly gave the Comptroller’s office the discretion to decide which kinds of fines are appropriate to withhold, so, No, @good luck & @Just Me 2; no laws being picked, chosen or ignored - just followed. Always love reading you, OW. Thanks west wing, Sonny, Cheryl44 & DuPage Dem.

    Comment by Abdon Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 2:59 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.