Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Pritzker, Preckwinkle, Cupich call for peace, reforms
Posted in:
S&P Global Ratings believes that Illinois’ (BBB-/Negative) adopted budget continues to be precariously balanced, and does not include measures to meaningfully address structural instability. We consider the fiscal 2021 budget structurally misaligned, as along with an outstanding $7.2 billion bill backlog, the pension and other postemployment benefit obligations are not funded based on actuarial recommendations. On a budgetary basis, the total resources exceed the total expenditures, but the revenue side anticipates an additional $5 billion in either additional direct federal aid or borrowings through the Federal Reserve’s Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF). Whereas we believe that additional direct federal aid is possible, the amount, timing, and potential restrictions on use are unclear at this point, and so budgeting potential use introduces risk.
Should additional federal aid not be received or not be received to provide liquidity in time for budgetary use, the state passed legislation allowing for MLF borrowing, with potential repayment over up to a 10-year period, although the current MLF authorization allows only for 36-month repayment schedules. Management indicates that the $5 billion may not be borrowed at one time, but if needed, could be tapped in various borrowings from the MLF over the fiscal year. There is capacity in the MLF authorization legislation for an additional $5 billion from Illinois, but such a borrowing simply shifts the repayment to future budget years, and the hope for additional aid is a precarious assumption. The state recently sold $800 million in tax-exempt general obligation (GO) bonds on the open market, demonstrating some level of market access, and the MLF is designed to provide liquidity when other market conditions would be uncertain or costly.
The new budget has a $39.0 billion operating component and then another $3.9 billion in additional expenditures, including statutory transfers out, debt service, and other borrowing repayments (including those needed to fund operations in fiscal 2020). All spending considered, the $42.9 billion budget is 5.8% larger than the fiscal 2020 budget. Illinois entered into this recession slowly working toward budget stability, but with little to no money in the budget stabilization fund (BSF). Where many other states had taken advantage of the long economic expansion following the Great Recession, Illinois faced political gridlock through multiple fiscal years, built a significant bill backlog, delayed action to reduce a sizable pension obligation, and could not accumulate a rainy day fund. We consider the state’s current options available to address the pandemic to be limited, compared to those of other states.
In the 2021 budget, the revenue side introduces more risk. Compared with the draft executive budget presented in January, the adopted budget reflects over a $4 billion decrease in recurring revenues, or 10.5% lower. The nominally largest revenue decrease is in the individual income tax line: the $1.8 billion decrease is 8.8% off the January estimate. But the sales tax estimate decrease is a larger percentage decline, with the almost $1.6 billion reduction reflecting a 17.5% decrease in assumed receipts for the fiscal year. These, and all other, revenue declines are offset through an increase of $300 million in interfund borrowing, the previously mentioned $5 billion MLF borrowing or federal aid receipts, and $1.274 billion in potential new individual income taxes, should a constitutional amendment pass in November instituting a graduated income tax. The original estimate of additional revenue receipts attributable to the graduated income tax was $1.435 billion, and so the state is reflecting a reduction caused by the recession.
So, in order to fully meet the total expenditure obligations in the budget, the state is relying on interfund borrowing, either federal aid or further federal borrowing, and the support of the electorate to vote to revise the tax structure to raise more revenue. Should any of those not materialize as expected, the state will need to look to more significant expenditure cuts through later legislative action. We believe the state has capacity to make cuts to close a gap, as there are no cuts in the current budget.
Illinois expects that the $5 billion MLF borrowing would be tapped if direct federal aid is not sufficient in terms of timing or amount. Should the direct federal support not materialize as hoped, the security for the MLF borrowing is the state GO, and we would view this borrowing on parity with existing GO debt. Currently the outstanding GO debt has a relatively rapid maturity with 74% retired within the next decade, and so there is some replacement capacity, but by our calculations, Illinois already has the fifth-highest debt per capita in the nation. Debt service on existing debt declined from fiscal 2020 by 11% or $211 million in the adopted fiscal 2021 budget.
The expenditure side of the fiscal 2021 budget holds most line items to the fiscal 2020 spending levels, but there are no layoffs or program eliminations being adopted to help balance the budget. Level funding, though, will extend personnel and purchasing controls put in place at the outset of the pandemic, into fiscal 2021. The school funding formula is set equal to fiscal 2020; however, this is $350 million less than the state intended to fund for fiscal 2021 when it revised its school funding formula several years ago, and $462 million or 5.2% less than the governor’s original budget earlier this year. The college and university system, although funded $129 million less than in the January draft budget, is also level funded to the fiscal 2020 budget. So, the state is holding the districts to level funding assumptions, but with existing teacher contracts and other obligations, we do expect cuts to be passed down to the local school level decision-makers.
There are a couple of credit positives in the adopted budget. First, the statutorily set annual pension contribution is being fully met. As the statutory pension funding is designed to attain a 90% funded status in 2045, this is one of the least conservative funding methodologies in the nation among state peers, and so anything less than meeting this obligation would have been seen as a notable credit negative. Second, the state appropriated the necessary amounts to support the priority lien ratings we have tethered to the state, Build Illinois (BBB/Negative), Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (MPEA) (BBB/Negative), and Illinois Sports Facility Authority (BBB/Negative), with additional provisions to support the MPEA operations.
As we have noted in past reports, Illinois has a history of leaving difficult fiscal choices to future budgets, and to the extent that expected federal aid does not materialize and the state does not adjust expenditures to reflect available resources, the fiscal 2021 budget could weaken the state’s credit trajectory.
Fiscal Year 2020 CloseoutThe state expects a $2.7 billion shortfall through the end of the fiscal year and is closing that gap predominantly through federal aid and borrowing. Not all of this is lost revenue, however, as income taxes will be due in the next fiscal year, on July 15, conforming with the federal change to the tax filing date. The largest component of the resources needed to close the fiscal 2020 gap is a $1.2 billion borrowing likely through the MLF. The contemplated GO Certificate Series of June 2020 would need to be repaid in June 2021. This borrowing provides immediate cash flow support, but does create a cash flow pressure for the time of repayment. Additionally, the state is using other interfund borrowings to close out the fiscal year, including $400 million through the Treasurer’s Investment Pool. In times of fiscal challenge, we often see budget gaps closed with use of reserves, expenditure cuts and deferrals, new revenues, and debt. As Illinois entered the recession without reserves to tap, and believes state government services critical to responding to the pandemic, the solutions to date have all been on the debt and federal assistance side of the ledger.
The state has over the past three months received more than $5 billion in federal aid. Much of that has restrictions on use, in that it has to be used to cover costs associated with fighting COVID-19. As the state’s expenditures to date have not been to this level, and the state has until Dec. 31, 2020 to account for the spending, the receipt of these funds has been helpful in addressing the unbudgeted costs associated with the pandemic.
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 3:12 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Pritzker, Preckwinkle, Cupich call for peace, reforms
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
In other words, I’m gonna apply for another credit card and hope the limit is enough to shift balances over with a grace period even though I don’t have anywhere near the income to pay them off…. sigh …kick the can version 7, 8, 9, ????
Comment by Silent majority Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 3:25 pm
econ 101
“We believe the state has capacity to make cuts to close a gap, as there are no cuts in the current budget.”
Comment by Donnie Elgin Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 3:26 pm
Please name the specific cuts and the amounts.
Comment by filmmaker prof Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:02 pm
Silent Majority -
“… shift balances over with a grace period … .”
So, you’d pay down the pension debt quicker than the Edgar Pension Ramp? Please specify cuts to do so.
Comment by Anyone Remember Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:10 pm
Latest state budget continues to be precarious (stop)
Comment by City Zen Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:12 pm
It’s not clear why anyone should give any credence to S&P in the wake of an unprecedented pandemic that has crushed state and municipal budgets nationwide.
Comment by Quibbler Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:24 pm
=Please name the specific cuts and the amounts=
Just stop with this silliness. The Democrats OWN the process.
Turns out when you have all of the votes and the Governor’s mansion, governing falls on you.
Stop with the Republicans show us your cuts nonsense. They voted NO on the budget. The folks who are in the super majority have to be prepared to make the difficult choices. It comes with the territory. Buck up.
The people who do serious arithmetic for a living indicate that it doesn’t add up and the ILGA made little attempt to make it so . . . .not exactly man bites dog kind of stuff.
Comment by Hey There Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:35 pm
Even though it is “one of the least conservative funding methodologies in the nation” at least “the statutorily set annual pension contribution is being fully met.” We hadn’t done that since PQ.
Comment by Proud Sucker Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:40 pm
Good to see the death and destruction sdvocates above remain among us.
Comment by Morty Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 4:55 pm
Wordslinger would note that the State has never missed a bond payment. And that the State doesn’t deserve the low rating it has.
Comment by RNUG Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 5:21 pm
RNUG. but yet we enter into negotiated bond deals over, and over again.
Comment by Blue Dog Dem Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 5:38 pm
Hey There -
“The Democrats OWN the process.”
Then why does Durkin, via his actions, ask to be part of the process? And check out Rep. Brady’s comments about local public safety pensions.
Comment by Anyone Remember Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 5:50 pm
==Please name the specific cuts and the amounts==
Folks here expect you to do for free what JB pays his staff twice not to do.
Race to the bottom.
Comment by City Zen Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 7:57 pm
=== Folks here expect you to do for free what JB pays his staff twice not to do.===
Just apply for a state job already, something with Finance or the Budget, maybe union too, get to be shop steward.
Thanks.
Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 8:00 pm
==Just apply for a state job already==
Does that include a mirror salary or partnership stake in East Jackson Street LLC? Because I’m not doing all that work for half the pay of my co-workers while they watch me do their job for them.
Comment by City Zen Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 8:10 pm
=== Does that include…===
This is why you’re not taken seriously.
Same grievances, no solutions.
Pandemic, protests…
Good luck.
Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Jun 2, 20 @ 8:25 pm
Hey There: How is it silly for someone to ask what should be cut? It’s an honest question, more honest than your rant.
Comment by Da Big Bad Wolf Wednesday, Jun 3, 20 @ 8:13 am