Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: It is what it is, so you’d better learn to deal with it
Next Post: Adventures in fundraising
Posted in:
* Bruce Rushton…
An investigator with the inspector general’s office for the state Department of Human Services remains on the job despite findings that he has sexually harassed employees of agencies that hold DHS contracts.
According to a report released last month by the state Executive Ethics Commission, Manuel “Manny” Zepeda told three women employed by Marcfirst, a Normal nonprofit that helps the developmentally disabled, that he had an ex-girlfriend who once obtained Viagra for him. Then he told the women that his wife liked to have sex in hotels. All the time, according to the report prepared by the Office of the Executive Inspector General, Zepeda was staring at a whiteboard in the agency office, and when someone said, “That’s not on our board,” Zepeda said that he should probably leave before he got another sexual harassment complaint against him. The conduct occurred in July 2018.
Reactions from employees, according to the report, ranged from alarm to someone who said, “This is just typical Manny” and, “You have to play along.” One of the employees who witnessed Zepeda’s behavior had met him that day. Zepeda was in Marcfirst offices to conduct an investigation, the nature of which wasn’t disclosed in the report released by the ethics commission. As an investigator, Zepeda is charged with investigating allegations of abuse, financial exploitation and neglect involving people who receive services from agencies licensed, funded, operated or certified by DHS.
One Marcfirst employee told the inspector general that Zepeda was “always inappropriate and creepy,” but she had decided to “let it go.” While she said that she was offended and made uncomfortable by Zepeda’s comments, she said she didn’t feel that she could speak up because her agency might suffer negative consequences from his investigations.
Another employee had similar concerns.
“I’ve always been told by coworkers to go along with what Manny says because it could affect the outcome of the case he is inquiring about,” the employee wrote in a statement.
* Hannah Meisel…
Zepeda was put on 30 days of unpaid leave earlier this fall, according to DHS spokesperson Meghan Powers, after having been moved off of investigations involving the disability service agencies whose employees made complaints. Additionally, a letter has been put in his personnel file.
“IDHS takes employee misconduct extremely seriously,” Powers said in a statement. “In 2018, IDHS strengthened its sexual harassment policy, which was relied upon for the OEIG report. We will continue to aggressively enforce anti-harassment policies and ensure a safe environment for those we represent and serve.”
Zepeda received a pay bump of $1,000 per pay period in 2019, from $6,800 last year to $7,800. Even with his 30-days of unpaid suspension time, Zepeda has made $75,800 so far in 2019, according to state records.
Zepeda’s union contact with AFSCME may have played a role in both the raise — as state workers finally received step increases earlier this year that had been denied to them by former Gov. Bruce Rauner — and Zepeda’s continued employment with DHS.
The full report is here.
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:00 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: It is what it is, so you’d better learn to deal with it
Next Post: Adventures in fundraising
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Wonder if he thought the State of Illinois sexual harassment training was to teach him how to do it.
Comment by Huh? Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:07 pm
Creeps like Manny need to be exposed for what they are and weeded out.
Comment by Stones Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:10 pm
Why was Zepeda not fired like Tim Mapes and Kevin Quinn? It seems like a double standard. If Zepeda worked for Madigan he would have been fired!
Comment by Frankie Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:20 pm
-Why was Zepeda not fired…?-
-Zepeda’s union-
-Additionally, a letter has been put in his personnel file.-
Oh no, not that!
Comment by Ron Burgundy Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:53 pm
He can go get a job with ComEd now. Just sayin.
Comment by Just Me 2 Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 12:54 pm
He should be fired>. The ig. Should not be reappointed>. Neither should her husband at the tollway ig
Comment by Fired Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:13 pm
===Oh no, not that!===
Don’t mock. It’s on official State letterhead!
Comment by Cubs in '16 Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:14 pm
Not every person who sexually harasses someone deserves to be fired. A 30 day suspension seems reasonable given the behavior described in the post.
Comment by Pelonski Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:22 pm
The articles reflect on Manny but the honest truth …. the management of his is the issue.
Comment by R A T Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:29 pm
@ Pelonski
So you would say that the state of Illinois has a double standard when it comes to punishment for sexual harassment?
Comment by Frankie Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:41 pm
It’s like the movie “inception”….5 layers deep, investigators investigating investigators. Illinois is special for its layers of abuse.
Comment by Ed Equity Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 1:48 pm
@Fired, DHS has its own IG, separate from the Office of the Executive Inspector General. Zepeda is with DHS’s IG, not the OEIG.
Comment by Wonk Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 4:00 pm
Who inspects the inspectors? As it turns out, another inspector who lets them off the hook.
Comment by Bobby McGee Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 6:44 pm
Want to comment on 3 areas:
The factor of union membership in the decision. Yes, sadly it is true from my experience. If you’re in the union then firing is not an option. 2nd, the IG at the Tollway, an IG that seems to be limited to small fish. 3rd, with the new CHA takeover will the 2nd point be able to police the changes that the former CHA team are trying to make.
Comment by Anon Tuesday, Nov 19, 19 @ 7:33 pm
Just to clarify, this was an employee of the DHS internal IG. The investigation was conducted by the Executive IG, which is external to DHS. The Executive IG does not determine the level of discipline. That’s up to the agency (DHS in this case).
Comment by Twirling Towards Freedom Wednesday, Nov 20, 19 @ 11:56 am