Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Does Exelon want to be an Illinois energy provider or not?
Next Post: Our sorry state
Posted in:
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
The first day of the 2019 veto session on Monday was unlike any other that most people have ever seen.
First, we learned that Rep. Luis Arroyo, D-Chicago, had been arrested on public corruption charges. About an hour later, federal prosecutors claimed that Arroyo had attempted to bribe a state senator, who has been cooperating with the feds since 2016.
An alleged venal criminal in the House and a government mole in the Senate. That can tend to disrupt your day.
Even so, the House Democratic caucus meeting early that afternoon was almost completely routine. House Speaker Michael Madigan went over several mundane topics with members and then finally wound up an hour later by reading a statement to his members about Arroyo.
Madigan’s central message was that Arroyo must resign from the House or face a potential expulsion. One member of his caucus thanked him for the statement. Other than that, the meeting was routine. Members talked incessantly amongst themselves about Arroyo but were mainly mum in caucus.
Things were a little different in the Senate Democratic caucus meeting. Sen. Melinda Bush, D-Grayslake, angrily demanded that corrupt members should be forced out if they don’t leave. Sitting in that room was Sen. Tom Cullerton, D-Villa Park, who was indicted on over 40 federal counts during the summer. Tom Cullerton was re-elected just last year, so he can continue attending session unless he’s eventually convicted of a felony or is also expelled.
Also in that caucus meeting was Sen. Terry Link, D-Waukegan. The Sun-Times and the Tribune both reported that Link was the one who helped the feds sting Arroyo. Link, 72, the most prominent gaming expansion supporter in the Senate, repeatedly denied being the mole, and each of the newspapers relied on a single source for their stories. But the unnamed senator said on a government recording that he was in the “twilight” of his career, his first meeting with Arroyo was in Lake County and they talked about a gaming-related bill. If it’s not Link, the government sure seemed to go out of its way to draw a map to his house.
Regardless, this might put a damper on Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s gaming bill if Sen. Link is still involved. People may be hesitant to enter a negotiating room believing that someone in the venue might be manipulating them into saying something that the FBI could interpret as a potential criminal offense.
And then there are the lazy criminals who think the only way to get things done is by bribing people. That’s apparently the category that Arroyo falls into, if the government transcript of his conversation with the cooperating witness is accurate and in context.
”This is, this is the jackpot,” Rep. Arroyo said to that unnamed senator as he handed over the first of what he thought would be 12 $2,500 monthly checks.
Seriously? The jackpot? $2,500? That’s only 30 grand over the life of the one-year bribe. Either Arroyo figured the unnamed senator was desperate for cash or that the senator was recklessly corrupt. And “recklessly corrupt” is definitely what I would call someone who threw away their future by handing over a $2,500 check to an FBI informant.
Line 2 of the “List of Items to be Seized” in the September federal search warrant of Sen. Martin Sandoval’s Statehouse office read: “Items related to CW1, Lobbyist A, and/or Lobbyist B.” CW is fed-speak for “cooperating witness.”
The unnamed senator is described in the Arroyo criminal complaint as “CW-1.” The cooperating witness “became a source for the FBI” in 2016. The feds must have let that person off the hook for something else because the complaint says the person had to be “admonished multiple times” to report his/her involvement in any “unauthorized” illegal activity. And then the witness allegedly filed false income tax returns and the FBI “closed” him as a source. They apparently gave the senator an opportunity at redemption, or at least a sentence reduction, with the Arroyo sting.
The herd mentality requires a rejection of informants. This particular informant, mole or whatever else you want to call it, was obviously no angel. But he did help nab someone who apparently thought he could bribe a state senator into carrying legislation to legalize sweepstakes games. There is a strong positive to what the cooperating witness accomplished here.
By the end of the week, Arroyo had resigned. In his resignation letter, he practically begged his colleagues to let his district keep the pork projects he had inserted into the infrastructure program. Maybe somebody should take a look at those.
We’ll get to several other stories on this topic soon.
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 10:20 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Does Exelon want to be an Illinois energy provider or not?
Next Post: Our sorry state
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
There seem to be quite a few venal and lazy criminals in Illinois politics these days. It really cheapens the insults.
Comment by Three Dimensional Checkers Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 10:56 am
Have they revealed who lobbyist 1 and/or 2 is/are?
Comment by Inquiring minds: Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 10:58 am
It seems like everybody is corrupt, but I am proud of many of the legislators and lobbyists that i work with. We have so many smart committed legislators. We have many lobbyists who understand the difference between right and wrong, and they do things the right way. We are hearing so much these days about the law breakers. We will get past this, and we will be better off for it.
Comment by 32nd warder Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 11:11 am
The federal house dems seem pretty clean but everyone else looks to be on the take.
I guess the Illinois dems go to court and beg for leniency because at least it’s not from a hostile foreign government.
Comment by Not a Billionaire Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 11:31 am
Safe Road was littered with people taking $1K or $2K a month in shake downs or bribes. With inflation over the last two decades, $2,500 a month sounds about right.
Comment by DIstant watcher Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 11:36 am
I am not sure where all around the state your syndicated column runs, Rich, but I hope a lot of people in Illinois see it. I think there is not a good understanding across the general public of the breadth and complexity of what’s been going on. Articles like yours helps.
Comment by Responsa Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 12:27 pm
== In his resignation letter, he practically begged his colleagues to let his district keep the pork projects he had inserted into the infrastructure program. ==
“Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses.” Luke 16:3-4
Comment by Whatever Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 12:31 pm
It’s time these caucus meetings were subject to the Open Meetings Act.
Comment by Just Me 2 Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 12:54 pm
What is great about Rich and the service he provides in his columns is giving such a great perspective with that reporter mentality, while piecing it together in a greater context. Great stuff, always.
To the post,
The loyalty of John Cullerton to his caucus, is it a “good” to its fault here, or a fault that is now being exposed with a bright light?
Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Nov 4, 19 @ 12:59 pm