Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: 800 Solar Projects Waitlisted Across Illinois Because Of The Renewable Funding Cliff
Next Post: Pritzker totals up his wins

Legislators in line for first pay raise in eleven years

Posted in:

* AP at 2:20 this afternoon

Illinois lawmakers are in line for a pay raise after a paperwork mix-up that went uncorrected.

The House adjourned its spring session Saturday without taking action on a measure that would have frozen base legislative salaries at $67,836. That means that lawmakers would receive an estimated $1,600 annual pay increase if Gov. J.B. Pritzker signs the budget.

It would be the first pay raise for legislators since 2008. But Senate Democrats conceded during debate on the budget Friday night that an agreed-to freeze on a cost-of-living increase was not in legislation authorizing the spending plan. So they amended another bill to prohibit the COLA and sent it to the House.

The House took no action. Democratic House Majority Leader Greg Harris of Chicago noted there were no questions about the COLA during debate on the budget.

Steve Brown is spokesman for Chicago Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan. He says he’s not aware of a COLA but said there’s an increase for lawmakers’ office expenses.

The bill they amended was HB837. It passed the Senate 58-0 after Friday’s midnight deadline. Several Senators quickly jumped on as co-sponsors.

The original House sponsor was Rep. Stephanie Kifowit (D-Oswego), but on Saturday Rep. Thaddeus Jones (D-Calumet City) became the chief sponsor and quickly filed a motion to non-concur with the Senate amendment. The motion was never called for a vote.

* AP at 3:53 this afternoon

The COLA issue arose Friday night as the Senate debated budget-implementation language. The sponsor, Chicago Democratic Sen. Heather Steans, was surprised to learn that an agreed-to freeze on COLAs was absent from the legislation. [Senate] Democrats remedied the omission by adding the prohibition to another bill they sent to the House, but the House took no action.

“You should go and ask the House why they didn’t pass the bill that we sent them,” Steans said. “Most folks get annual cost-of-living increases in their jobs, or are evaluated for them. It’s not an outrageous expectation that more than once in a 10-year period we’d get them.”

Steve Brown, spokesman for Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan, said he was unaware of a pay increase. He said the budget included an increase in reimbursement for legislators’ district office expenses. […]

“Illinois citizens are sick and tired of secret insider budget deals that enrich Springfield politicians at the expense of hardworking taxpayers who are getting hit with massive tax increases,” said [Rep. David McSweeney, R-Barrington Hills], who voted “no” on the budget.

The salary freeze plan that the Senate sent to the House required only a vote to concur. Rep. Thaddeus Jones, a Calumet City Democrat, filed a motion to non-concur in the freeze. Calling the motion for a vote would have forced House members to vote in favor or against rejecting the freeze.

I don’t necessarily begrudge them the pay hikes. It’s been eleven years since the last one and they’ve done a whole lot this year, unlike past years. But I’m thinking there was no “paperwork mix-up.”

…Adding… The entire House GOP caucus plus Democratic Rep. Carol Ammons signed on to a bill introduced in February (HB2965) to prevent the pay raise.

posted by Rich Miller
Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 4:14 pm

Comments

  1. As meticulous as Madigan is about bills goung through the House, I agree it was no mix-up. Trust without question in the process at your peril.

    Comment by My New Handle Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 4:37 pm

  2. –Illinois lawmakers are in line for a pay raise after a paperwork mix-up that went uncorrected.–

    Yikes, I don’t think the AP wants to just state that as a fact. There are other plausible, if cynical, explanations.

    If it was a “mistake,” perhaps the governor can use his reduction veto powers to correct it for them.

    Comment by wordslinger Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 4:39 pm

  3. Refusing to give legislators a cost of living increase ke trying to lower their salary just puts being a legislator out of reach for the typical middle or lower class individual.

    Comment by Candy Dogood Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 4:50 pm

  4. Meh, they deserve it. Hope the staff is being handsomely awarded for all of their work as well.

    Comment by Mittuns Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 4:54 pm

  5. Speaker Madigan was “unaware” of the pay hike and claims middle class Illinois residents received a tax cut this session.

    Tells you everything you need to know about Springfield.

    Comment by Lucky Pierre Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 5:04 pm

  6. They deserve more than that should be paid what a Chicago Alderman are

    Comment by Soft R Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 5:09 pm

  7. Legislators and alderman are both part time. Aldermen should be paid less give alderman a choice forgo your insurance license don’t and don’t take tax reduction or workers completely against city if you are an attorney

    Comment by DuPage Saint Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 5:21 pm

  8. “Surprised” “unaware” “mix-up” “ uncorrected”
    Yep here’s George Carlin to interpret.

    https://youtu.be/HEeDRUZIDq8

    Comment by Yep Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 5:24 pm

  9. And for quite a few legislators it’s their first pay raise in less than a year on the job.

    Comment by My New Handle Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 6:01 pm

  10. I know a lot of merit comp employees who would like toget a raise every 11 years.

    Comment by SAP Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 6:09 pm

  11. ===Refusing to give legislators a cost of living increase ke trying to lower their salary just puts being a legislator out of reach for the typical middle or lower class individual.===

    Agreed. Being a “part-time” legislator is not an option for many who would like to serve. 1) Many constituents expect their Rep or Sen to be available full time. 2) Most jobs don’t let you take off 5 months plus two weeks. 3) Many of the folks who say the job is part-time turn around and complain about conflicts of interest.

    Comment by Pot calling kettle Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 7:04 pm

  12. That is 2.35%. Now if only staff and faculty could get that at Governors State University. Our president sure does.

    Comment by Anonymous Sunday, Jun 2, 19 @ 7:27 pm

  13. I’d rather they just own it and say they deserve it than playing games and saying it was an accident. Nobody will believe that.

    Comment by Not It Monday, Jun 3, 19 @ 7:05 am

  14. “Agreed. Being a “part-time” legislator is not an option for many who would like to serve”

    Uh, guys, you read the part where the base salary is 67k, for a part time gig? That’s more than the median household income in IL. I don’t hate a bump once a decade, but let’s not pretend these guys are paupers.

    Comment by Perrid Monday, Jun 3, 19 @ 8:36 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: 800 Solar Projects Waitlisted Across Illinois Because Of The Renewable Funding Cliff
Next Post: Pritzker totals up his wins


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.