Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: The downside to making the pension buyout program permanent
Next Post: “They’re putting nails in our coffins”
Posted in:
* From The Gate…
On February 6th, University of Chicago College Republicans President Brett Barbin spoke to David Krupa, a candidate for alderman in Chicago’s 13th Ward, over the phone. They discussed allegations against Krupa made by the candidate’s ex-girlfriend, Juliet Schmidt. These allegations are outlined in an emergency order of protection filed by Schmidt’s family, which has since been vacated.
The content of the conversation left Barbin unsettled, and he came to Gate reporters with his concerns. The Gate has since spoken with Barbin, Krupa, Schmidt, and others to investigate the allegations ahead of the February 26th Chicago election. […]
Krupa claims that the allegations in the documents were falsified by [Juliet’s father] Michael Schmidt in order to keep the couple apart. […]
However, Juliet Schmidt told the Gate that she agreed with her parents that an EOP was necessary, and that she was afraid of seeing Krupa at the time the order of protection was filed.
Schmidt said the idea of filing an order of protection was first suggested by a social worker she met with due to issues in her relationship with Krupa. Her teacher, Amy Fritsch, confirmed she sent Schmidt to see the social worker during school hours. Her father corroborated that the idea of filing an EOP was first proposed by the social worker. Schmidt said that her father filed the EOP on her behalf due to the fact she was only 17 years old at the time. “My dad did file it,” she said, “but it was my decision.”
* But the big bombshells were the allegations made by College Republicans President Brett Barbin about a phone call he says he had with Krupa…
[Krupa] said the judge in the case was never going to side with him because she was female. He wished he had had a white, male judge who had faced these kinds of allegations in the past, stating that then he would have been fine. In the midst of our conversation about the case, Mr. Krupa admitted to one of the allegations. In a conversation about his condom use, Mr. Krupa said he did not like wearing a condom during sex and never did early on in his relationship with his ex-girlfriend. But, later on, his ex-girlfriend asked him to start using a condom when the relationship was falling apart. I then asked if he ever took his condom off without her consent. He confirmed this, and said that she never had a problem with unprotected sex at the beginning of their relationship. He then questioned the difference that it made.
To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Krupa has only categorically denied these allegations to the public. He has dismissed them as politically motivated and fabricated by his ex-girlfriend’s father who did not want them to date. Based on the conversation I had with Mr. Krupa on February 6, I believe his public denials to be at least partially false. […]
Mr. Krupa is seeking an office with the responsibility of handling millions in public tax dollars. He has opened himself up to criticism and rigorous vetting in order to earn the public’s endorsement and trust. I would never want a representative who could so easily and consistently lie about his background.
As a Republican in Chicago, I often find myself at odds with the prevailing opinion. However, I think we can all agree that City Council does not need any more lies and deception.
Krupa addresses those allegations in The Gate’s story.
* Meanwhile…
Clarification of Paul’s Public Schedule
Contrary to recent releases, Paul Vallas will not be participating in aldermanic candidate David Krupa’s “New Chicago Way Coalition” or joint press conference regarding the initiative. We did not provide or approve use of our logo. Any questions regarding the matter can be directed to our media contact.
And…
Our press conference for this afternoon has been postponed. Another date will be announced.
— David Krupa (@DavidKrupa13) February 22, 2019
Oops.
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:37 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: The downside to making the pension buyout program permanent
Next Post: “They’re putting nails in our coffins”
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Is this that nice “19-year-old DePaul student” that Kass is always promoting as Luke Skywalker taking on the Empire?
Madigan…. and the College Republicans he controls.
Comment by wordslinger Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:46 am
Krupa doesn’t know what difference wearing a condom makes?
By the way, in Germany stealthing is considered sexual assault.
Comment by Da Big Bad Wolf Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:50 am
Did the Tribune endorse Gary Johnson in this race?
Comment by Juvenal Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:52 am
Krupa and the Tribune editors who endorsed him make a terrific team.
Keep Krupa in mind whenever you read a Trib editorial
Comment by Truthteller Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:54 am
Isn’t Krupa the Tribune endorsed candidate?
Editorial board is consistent- always wrong
Comment by Truthteller Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:56 am
===Madigan…. and the College Republicans he controls.===
Sadly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see that unironically suggested on the Tribune editorial board.
Krupa seems like an archetypal abuser. I felt a little nauseous reading through the pdf. I guess I’ll take comfort in my immense faith in Marty Quinn to destroy this guy.
Comment by Angel's Sword Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 11:59 am
Krupa is really pushing the no swearing prohibition on this blog. If Stava-Murray really wants to make a difference, she should propose a bill to make stealthing illegal in IL.
Comment by lakeside Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:03 pm
If consent is conditional, e.g., only with a condom, then unilaterally not complying with the condition is the same as no consent. Regarding Krupa’s question as to what is the difference between protected and unprotected sex, this should have been covered by his school or family — protection reduces the chances of an unwanted pregnancy and transmission of certain STDs. His partner has the right to seek to reduce her risk of these consequences.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:08 pm
Good on Mr. Barbin.
– MrJM
Comment by @misterjayem Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:12 pm
Krupa sounds rather presidential. All he needs is a 6 figure settlement to turn that TRO into a NDA.
Comment by Henry Francis Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:16 pm
==He then questioned the difference that it made.==
Oh boy…
Comment by So_Ill Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:17 pm
“But you were okay with it that one time” ain’t consent, broseph. Excellent on-brand touch, by the way, about how a white, male judge would have let you slide on all this, and touting it as a feature, not a bug.
As I’ve said before, the future is bright for David Krupa at Turning Point USA.
Comment by Roadrager Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:20 pm
Republican and City of Chicago? bwahahaahha
Comment by 44th Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:20 pm
This guy doesn’t just seem unfit for public office, he seems unfit to be walking free.
Comment by Ron Burgundy Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:24 pm
It is sad it takes a college student to uncover the truth, while the tribune and the Times sit on This information. Well, why would they, he is running against Madigan, and they hate Madigan. Ugh, This poor girl.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:29 pm
If only there were a law that could have protected this woman and made it known that what he did (”stealthing” aka non-consensual condom removal) was illegal. Lawmakers…hello?
Comment by Introduce a Bill Please Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:33 pm
- “ He wished he had had a white, male judge who had faced these kinds of allegations in the past, stating that then he would have been fine.”
Paging Brett Michael Kavanaugh.
Comment by Chicago 20 Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:40 pm
The Tribune Editorial Board has no shame.
Comment by Annon3 Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:43 pm
Can you imagine the night sweats that this U of C Republican must have had before going public with this? Quite a Sophie’s choice….
Comment by Boone's is Back Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:43 pm
This is just vile. Hopefully he will increase the outmigration by one. David Krupa needs to go away. Illinois will be better for never hearing from him again.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:45 pm
Krupa certainly seems like a charmer.
Consent is freely given and either party is just as free to remove it. “You didn’t mind before” is indefensible, legally or otherwise.
Comment by thunderspirit Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:46 pm
Dear GOP,
Please pay attention to Mr. Barbin. If you want to become relevant again, start with better vetting of your candidates. But, if you make a mistake, denounce that candidate widely and loudly.
Comment by G'Kar Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:58 pm
–Republican and City of Chicago? bwahahaahha–
You should really suppress that urge to reveal your ignorance.
Comment by wordslinger Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:58 pm
=Madigan…and the college Republcans he contrtrols=
I’m surprised that the SJ-R didn’t come up with this. There are plenty of people downstate who would buy it.
Comment by A 400lb. Guy on a bed Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 12:59 pm
I’m not going to address the first part of the story because lakeside said it best I think. To the Daley thing- did this kid not think he would be called on this? I’m trying to understand his plan here for when Daley didn’t show up and the press started asking about it.
Comment by Fixer Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 1:01 pm
Mr Krupa, #MeToo would like a word with you.
Comment by A Jack Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 1:26 pm
Republican and City of Chicago? bwahahaahha–
You should really suppress that urge to reveal your ignorance.
—- actually right back at you.
Comment by 44th Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 1:33 pm
Would anyone like to ask candidate Krupa for his thoughts on February being Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month?
http://www.loveisrespect.org/
Comment by Roadrager Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 2:02 pm
—- actually right back at you.
Ah, the feared “I know you are but what I am” defense. Practiced by only the wittiest bros in the dorm.
So to recap: the U of C College GOP president, who clearly despises the 13th Ward, shows a little moral backbone and calls out Krupa and runs away from him as fast as he can, for good reason. Meanwhile the self-righteous crusaders in Tribsville, who can’t be bothered with matters like TROs, praise and endorse Krupa because…Madigan.
Katrina, Kass and their network of nitwits keep finding new ways to become the punchline.
Comment by John Deere Green Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 2:23 pm
I’d like to second the applause for Barbin. That was well done. Could have taken a hit for being ‘disloyal,’ but did the right thing - and for the party’s benefit. No one should be hiding the toxic deeds of these dudes; flush them out of both parties.
Comment by lakeside Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 2:28 pm
=College Republican leader alleges Krupa “easily and consistently” lies about his background=
I think this is called Presidential in GOP circles.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 2:35 pm
John Deere Green: bravo 👏, couldn’t have said it better myself.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 3:14 pm
Maybe Krup could get Gonzo to stand in for Gonzo to stand in
Comment by Annonin' Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 3:16 pm
So what’s the over/under on when Krupa/Peraica add The Gate and Barbin to their lawsuit?
Comment by Anon324 Friday, Feb 22, 19 @ 3:39 pm