1. - Pat collins - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:35 am:

   he hopes they’ll consider the “family structure”

   The Feds certainly did in the ENRON case, which is similar. They convicted the wife, who was in finance, and the hubby, who was a top VP. They got hubby to plead so his wife would get a deal.

   Problem was, a Fed Judge demanded she serve prison time.

   And she did, a year. Their kids were elem. and preschool, I think.

   A shot across the bow, beyond any doubt.




2. - Stooges - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:44 am:

   It just makes me wonder how complicit she is in the dealings with Rezko. If she was assisting in the planning of the schemes to get real estate commissions in return for the gov doing favors for Rezko and others (and that’s the way it appears), then she is in deep. I still think she’ll stay out of prison and Roddy will do the time.




3. - Cassandra - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:46 am:

   With respect to Enron, didn’t the couple get to serve sequential sentences so one could be with the kids?




4. - The Doc - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:48 am:

   Sympathy for the children, absolutely. But not for Patti. She’s kneep-deep in this mess, and if convicted, should only avoid prison time for the benefit of her kids.




5. - Pat collins - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:49 am:

   True, but they had to work that out with the Feds. That means, “co-operating” and “playing nicely”.

   I do not see that happening yet.




6. - Cynic - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:51 am:

   The Doc –
   I’m not apologist for G-Rod or any of the Illinois pols, but I really wonder how involved Patti was. Sure she has a potty mouth, but so what? Did she have any real authority to do anything in the political sphere or was she merely a wife trying to support her husband (albeit profanely)?




7. - Fire Ron Guenther - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:53 am:

   Cassandra is correct on the sequential order of sentencing so the kids had at least one parent at home




8. - Ghost - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:55 am:

   I beleive under the spousal imunity doctorine Blago’s attorneys can bar patti from testifying against him. i.e. if I have the priveledge correct it can be asserted by the husband even if the wife is consenting




9. - Chicago way - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:58 am:

   Cynic, you have missed the point. The feds are not going after her for disparaging remarks about the tribune and the cubs. If they were, the entire city would be accountable. She has her own real estate dealings and her own business dealing that have been the source of fed investigation since well before Rod was arrested. Any case against her may completely be separate on the merits and could be a completely separate indictment




10. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 9:59 am:

    The issue with Patti relates to her income from real estate deals, many with Tony Rezko. The questions being, of course, how she got that business and whether the income she received from it was truly earned by her or intended to be a payoff for Rod’s governmental decisions. Instead of handing a bribe to the public official, disguise it as commissions from a business deal and give it to his wife.




11. - Deeda - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:00 am:

    I feel so bad for the kids. Can you imagine what the kids are saying to them in school? If both parents get put in jail what is going to happen to there kids?




12. - The Doc - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:01 am:

    Cynic,

    If the subpoenas are any indication, her involvement appears pretty significant.

    I don’t give a hoot about her profanity - but her apparent willingness to vigorously support her husband’s endeavors is telling. And her real estate dealings have been a source of rampant speculation and scrutiny for quite a while.




13. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:02 am:

    Met her once. She came off as rude and arrogant. But, that’s not against the law. If she was getting real estate deals as a way to pay off her husband for favors, that’s another story.




14. - Euripides - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:02 am:

    Alas, thou bride of disaster.




15. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:04 am:

    As I recall the spousal privilege cannot prevent a spouse from testifying against a defendant if that spouse wants to testify (they can refuse), but the defendant can invoke privilege to protect marital confidences, or conversations they had in private, from being disclosed if they do testify.




16. - VanillaMan - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:06 am:

    Ferdinand? Meet Imelda.




17. - Stooges - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:10 am:

    Its a pretty good stretch to think that Patti was the mousy spouse that let her husband concoct deals with his cronies, while she obliviously collected real estate commissions. If there was a deal, she was in on it. I like the sequential prison terms idea.




18. - publius - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:11 am:

    lets not forget she took the pay to play job at the industrial league—we know rod wasn’t the brains of the outfit—perhaps…..




19. - Levois - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:12 am:

    If people didn’t like her then she must be about as nasty as Blago. Either that or they don’t like her because of her husband. Well I don’t know and I shouldn’t have comments.

    I hope that for the sake of their children they don’t have to do time. I can’t determine how deep she is in Blago’s corruption, although, we do know she supported him in holding up that Cubs deal. Man he was even cold to a team he publicly supports.




20. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:14 am:

    Clearly, the thought is that her fortune in real estate commissions were intended to disguise payoffs. Not a particularly ingenuous scheme, if true.

    I don’t know her, but she doesn’t strike me as a victim. Still, I’m old-school — if Rod has a chance to make a deal to keep her out of trouble, he should do it.




21. - Wacker Drive - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:21 am:

    “Blagojevich Campaign Committee” should be renamed The Blagojevich Family Stimulus




22. - Sangamon - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:38 am:

    As far as I can tell, Patti has a supporting brother and sister. Surely, someone would take the kids. But, we are years ahead of ourselves, here. The wheels of justice move slowly.

    Having kids didn’t keep Scott Fawell’s fiance out of prison. Heck, she didn’t even lose custody.

    I have to wonder how the Blagojevich’s are supporting themselves. That might be pretty good punishment in itself.




23. - Anon - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:40 am:

    I’m no Blagojevich apologist, but they have him dead to rights eight ways to Sunday. Is it really necessary to lock up his wife, as well?

    Couldn’t the U.S. Attorney’s office use their resources to, say, put a dent in the gang and drug problem in Chicago or solve the thousands of open Chicago-area bank robberies instead? Why is Patti Blagojevich even worth their time?




24. - Stooges - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 10:43 am:

    I would be interested to know what advice her father is giving her. Surely he has a strong opinion and is not inclined to help Rod unless it benefits her and the grandkids.




25. - Thomas Westgard - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:02 am:

    It has been my observation that, when faced with a Bonnie and Clyde team, prosecutors focus on the man as the head of the criminal behavior and give women a pass. I’ll take a wait-and-see approach since I don’t know what Patti did, but if she committed crimes, that’s the only relevant thing.

    I guess I’m reacting against the idea that their “family structure” matters, or even what that’s a code for. The underlying message is what, fathers are expendable, but if you put a mother in prison the kids will suffer? Rod and Patti are apparently a team of felons who have been robbing the state of a functioning government for years. Convict them both, and put the kids into the same process that other people have to go through. That is the system we have, and selective prosecution based on sexism is not the answer to its limitations.

    Illinois has kept people in solitary confinement at Tamms for a decade. We have people in prison for selling small quantities of marijuana. If we’re going to start having compassion for prisoners and reconsider our policies of excessive punishment, Patti Blagojevich is a really screwy place to start.




26. - Macbeth - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:03 am:

    === I have to wonder how the Blagojevich’s are supporting themselves. ===

    I assumed he’s got an advance on a book deal. My understanding was that the second round of the media blitz was also used to visit publishers in NYC. If he’s willing to name names — and burn every single bridge he can think of — I’m assuming the advance would be pretty sizable.

    I’m not sure who will buy the book — or if it’ll be like the OJ Simpson book — but it’ll probably have a good market the first few days for those who are checking to see if their names are mentioned.




27. - Dan S, a Voter, Taxpayer and Cubs Fan - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:04 am:

    I just thank God I have never met or crossed paths with Milorad, everything he has ever touched seems to explode. How can one buffoon cause so much pain.




28. - dupage dan - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:08 am:

    I believe that Patti should be compelled to assist in skewering Rodex-Gov and be given an out if she cooperates fully. One chance, the offer is on the table for 15 minutes, then all hell breaks loose. It doesn’t matter what her personality is. Her being complicit in the corruption only serves to expose her to possible prosecution and she becomes a tool in Fitz’s belt to help bring Rodex-Gov to the federal prison. Make a deal to get the bigger fish. She will serve her own “term” while her husband is in prison. Do you think anyone will hire her under these circumstances? I’m sure daddy Mell will offer help but can Patti go back on her knees to him? I won’t speculate further since I think she is the small fish to be turned on her husband. She will have enough to handle caring for her children after it is all over.




29. - Cynic - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:19 am:

    The real estate questions are going to be hard to answer. Sure, she probably got deals from people wanting to get access to the former Gov. But was there an explicit quid pro quo? That’s going to be hard to prove unless it’s 1) on tape or b) someone rolls over on her.




30. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:23 am:

    Cynic, you did hear Rezko got moved to much better quarters a while back and his sentencing was put off?




31. - Phineas J. Whoopee - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:38 am:

    If the feds are going after Patti it is because her moronic husband cares only about himself and is willing to let her go down with him. He is the most unchivalrous of characters. My son calls him Jafar-the bad guy from Aladdin.




32. - Ultra50k - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 11:53 am:

    If she’s guilty she should go to jail just like anybody else. If she did something wrong she should have considered the impact on her children at that time…not now. How are we going to deter people from wrongdoing’s if we give them a pass for their children’s sake, or any other reason.




33. - Legaleagle - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 12:14 pm:

    Part of the case against Gov. Ryan was based on benefits flowing to his family members instead of to him personally. That’s still a “thing of value” for bribery and federal extortion charges. Normally a person who is a subject of an investigation will take the fifth and decline to authenticate and produce any subpoenaed documents. Her compliance with the subpoena is curious.




34. - Little Egypt - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 12:29 pm:

    From what has been talked about on this blog and elsewhere over the past few years, I believe Patti is up to her behind in dirty real estate deals. Asking for information regarding her husband’s dealings is just adding ammunition to the fire. The Feds are putting pressure on her for just reason. They think she is dirty in her own right and are now looking for more.

    Rich, if you like her because you saw her human side, I would suggest she is a great actress and that is the side she wanted you to see. YOU are respected by the Illinois politicians and they don’t want you on their bad side. I believe the rude, crude, foul-mouthed woman others have seen is the true Patti Blagojevich. She has a deeply-etched scowl that could kill. That didn’t happen in the last 6 years. It’s been a life-long attitude.

    I wish I could have some compassion for this outfit. Unfortunately children “live what they learn”. I truly hope the girls’ innocence can be salvaged.

    Imagine the stomach acid being generated in that household. Book deal? There’s not much demand at the moment for a book entitled “I’m Innocent”, which would contain a few rote chapters: The fix was in; There’s a tax hike coming; I’m the anti-Nixon - I want ALL of the tapes released; They wouldn’t let me call my witnesses; The people elected me twice; I’ve provided health care to thousands of families; Mike Madigan the devil; Mammograms for all women; I’ve done nothing wrong; and last but not least - I’ve wanted to be on the Letterman Show in the worst way.




35. - Chanson - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 12:33 pm:

    Just because Patty is famous/infamous, does not mean she shouldn’t serve time. Lesser known couples must deal with it all the time. Under the circumstances,the kids could even now be better off in the home of a close relative and away from the drama.




36. - Anon - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 12:44 pm:

    What if Patti is the real brains of the outfit (well, ok, not “if”) and Rod was the innocent dupe? The feds cut a deal to let her walk if one or the other comes completely clean, and when the full story is told, it turns out that she’s the one who is really guilty?




37. - carbon deforestation - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 1:52 pm:

    Trib Sun Times Merger?

    Rich - have you noticed that the Tribune online has been using a lot of Courtesy Chicago Sun-Times articles lately? Even adding the link to the Sun-Times website at the bottom of this one http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-pattiblagojevich,0,2164073.story

    Do you think they are exploring a merger or something like that?




38. - Qwerty - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 1:58 pm:

    Slightly off topic. From the STL Post Dispatch:

    Publishers Weekly reports that a book about the “now-notorious” former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is being rushed to print. The publisher will be Ivan R. Dee, a small Chicago-based nonfiction house.

    ”Pay to Play: How Rod Blagojevich Turned Political Corruption Into a National Sideshow” by PBS correspondent Elizabeth Brackett is scheduled to go on sale in May.
    According to PW: “Brackett, who works for ‘The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,’ has followed Blagojevich’s career for some time now; she initially profiled him in 2002. The book, which shows how Blagojevich’s upbringing ultimately led to his comically tragic fall from grace, is getting a sizable push from the house, which has announced a first printing of 25,000 copies.”




39. - Anonymous - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 2:01 pm:

    Patti may be at the root of some of Rod’s problems. She was the one who nixed setting up house in the Governor’s Mansion (Even Governor Thompson used the mansion on at least a part-time basis) and this stupid gesture of contempt for downstate ruffled some feathers needlessly. I would be hard pressed to think of a First Lady of Illinois who maintained a lower profile than Patti Blagojevich in terms of supporting charities and the like. She was too consumed with money.




40. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 2:07 pm:

    ===this stupid gesture of contempt for downstate===

    What a crock. They had kids in school. They didn’t want their kids going to school here for obvious reasons. Jim Thompson moved back to the city when his kid was old enough to go to school.

    It may have been perceived that way by people who refused to listen or have a bit of empathy. But that’s their problem.

    Give it a rest.

    Also, downstaters really need to stop looking for validation from others.




41. - Ghost - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 4:29 pm:

    Legaleagle your missing the fun stuff, a RICO action against patti….




42. - TOO BAD SOO SAD - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 5:54 pm:

    I don’t feel anything for Patti, Blago, or their kids. These people break the law and should pay for their crimes. If you don’t want things like this to happen, then don’t do the crime. Something tells me that maybe the kids would be better off without parents like this. Grandpa Mel will make sure the kids are taken care of.

    Just imagine if this was one of us, do you think the Feds would give a rats petunia what happens to our kids.




43. - Toast Man - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 7:43 pm:

    If convicted wouldn’t Rod have to forfeit any earnings made on the book? Isn’t there a law in Illinois, courtesy of John Wayne Gacy, that criminals cannot profit from exploiting their notoriety gained from crimes they committed?




44. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 7:44 pm:

    A book on Blago by Elizabeth Brackett? I doubt it. What are her bona fides?

    Sounds like a quicky cut and paste job. Unless you can give some real insight on the real “pay to play,” and not stuff that’s just been reported, it’s not a real book.




45. - WindyCityGardener - Thursday, Feb 19, 09 @ 8:24 pm:

    The comparison I have heard from people who know Patti is Leona Helmsley “Queen of Mean”.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.